Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
shemnel said:
also this thing about City and broken football is taking too much away from Guardiola.

this squad, most of them in Saturday's XI, have featured Gundogan, Zinchenko, Walker, Danilo, Mahrez, Otamendi and Delph, none of whom are exactly world class superstars but have been made to perform better by the man in charge in a system that elevated everyone's game
Click to expand...

It isn't a 'thing' unless you are part of the cartel
 
Dubai Blue said:
Unsurprisingly, Martin Samuel just says it as it is. There's no agenda with him; he can see through all this bollocks and simply says it as he sees it.

Given the reaction we've seen in the last couple of days, you'd have thought there had never been a "boring", one-sided FA Cup final before where the winner was virtually guaranteed before kick-off. There's been loads of them; the likes of Wilson and Delaney are just choosing to erase these from their memories.

They would also have you believe that we've all but destroyed any semblance of competition in the game. Yet it's only a week since we won the league by a single point, and only two weeks since that was facilitated by the narrowest of margins as we scraped past the league's 9th placed team courtesy of a 70th minute thunderbolt from a 33-year-old centre back who cost us relative peanuts over a decade ago. Just how short are their memories?

Sometimes good teams struggle in games; other times, they make their superiority show. This is nothing new; it's been happening since football first started. Saturday was just one of those days where everything clicked.

And had the likes of Tottenham and Liverpool not been so quick to toss this historic competition off, we could have been facing a much stiffer challenge in the final. If these teams don't care about it, don't then come to us complaining that we've destroyed our opponents 6-0.

We're not the first team to have dominated English football, and we won’t be the last. I can think of two, in particular, who were lauded for doing so. Money clearly has an influence, but it is just as obviously not the only thing that matters.

No one was complaining about our financial muscle when United won the league in 2013, when Chelsea won it in 2015 and 2017, or when Leicester won it in 2016. We had the same owner back then, the same financial might, but other teams comfortably outperformed us. United have spent something like £800m since Ferguson left and look where it's got them. Meanwhile, both they and Liverpool spend more on wages than City do.

The real difference between all these teams is Pep Guardiola – the greatest football coach/manager there has ever been. But he's not going to be around forever. And when he does leave, football's success cycle will likely move on again, just as it always has done.

In the meantime, why can't the nation's hacks just sit back and admire the positive impact this genius is having, not only on Manchester City but on English football as a whole.
Click to expand...
Great post and spot on.
 
paulchapo said:
Martin Samuel.....brilliant.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...y-biggest-best.html?ito=amp_twitter_share-top
Click to expand...

That last line...eloquence in 10 words

"The protectionist FFP rules, meanwhile, have always been about keeping the established elite in place. Back in 2010, they thought they were untouchable, but that complacency has been exposed. Never forget the clubs who made football all about money in the first place.

What they really hate is City winning at their game."
 
The greatest football ever seen, the greatest manager in the world, humble hard working players and all these cnuts can do is cry and moan on behalf if the dipper/rag cartel and their gimp club arsenal.
Maybe we should go back to the 70s and 80s when it was like the Scottish league. Now we have 5 excellent teams playing great entertetaining football and they just can't see how their product is being enhanced!


And why oh why is Dan Roan still allowed in?
There's probing journalism and then there's just jealous vindictive sh#t raking.
If you see him tonight, I'm sure he'd be interested in our views.
 
Last edited:
Salford_Blue said:
That last line...eloquence in 10 words

"The protectionist FFP rules, meanwhile, have always been about keeping the established elite in place. Back in 2010, they thought they were untouchable, but that complacency has been exposed. Never forget the clubs who made football all about money in the first place.

What they really hate is City winning at their game."
Click to expand...
Everyone can see what Martin Samuel is talking about, but choose to look away.
 
The ones who justify Harris' question on the grounds that questions are important would object thoroughly if they were subject to the same thing. Asking questions is fine, but they do have to be justified. Otherwise, we're all free to ask anything we like of them on the same grounds, and - more importantly - they're compelled to answer them.

That they don't like.
 
Henkeman said:
The ones who justify Harris' question on the grounds that questions are important would object thoroughly if they were subject to the same thing. Asking questions is fine, but they do have to be justified. Otherwise, we're all free to ask anything we like of them on the same grounds, and - more importantly - they're compelled to answer them.

That they don't like.
Click to expand...
Exactly. And even if it was justified, there's a time and place for questions like that. This was neither.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top