Media coverage 2018/19

[newfaceinhell]

I hate the fact we have to pay their wages to slag us off,almost worth going to prison for not paying the license fee

What is this license you speak of ?

 

[Tricky_Trev]

TBF we've not had any sarcastic or piss taking articles about the parade. Not that I have seen.

At the end when everyone was dispersing, yet the players were still on stage soaking it in, i was looking out for professional photographers trying to get the money shot of players on stage with a large area of empty road. Didn’t see any, otherwise there’d have been broken lenses dotted about

 

[aguerooooo]

Just off topic had the pleasure of watching the last Sunday Supplement of this season which in all honesty was okay except for the totally obvious grumbling of Rob Draper He might of just been sat with a scouse kit and scarf on in short our total domination is ruining football and we have Liverpool to be grateful for in making it a title race His wish for next season is that we are not involved in the title race

 

[Kinkys Left Foot]

Unfortunately he will be disappointed however I can point out the nearest Boots where they sell razor blades.
Not to cut his wrists you understand to have a shave you scruffy czunt

 

[citizen_maine]

A new attack from the NYT on City.

For Europe’s Soccer Chief, the Outrage Arrives in Waves
A Champions League restructuring and a looming fight with Manchester City have UEFA’s Aleksander Ceferin sitting atop a soccer economy that feels as if it’s pulling itself apart

“Sometimes,” Ceferin said, “we forget how dirty this industry is.”(and it start’s at UEFA’s doorstep, you hypocrite)

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/20/...-arrives-in-waves.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

"The leagues denounced the plan, with the most vocal of their leaders, Javier Tebas of the Spain’s La Liga, darkly suggesting that UEFA had no interest in listening to stakeholders beyond a small cartel of top clubs."

Has Tebas just admitted to being part of a cartel?

 

[Andrew___K]

"The leagues denounced the plan, with the most vocal of their leaders, Javier Tebas of the Spain’s La Liga, darkly suggesting that UEFA had no interest in listening to stakeholders beyond a small cartel of top clubs."

Has Tebas just admitted to being part of a cartel?

No. On the contrary, he pretends to be opposed to UEFA's plans. I think it's a typical political trick - the Cartel plants its vocal representatives on all sides to rule the process.

 

[Blue Pete]

Part of me wonders if the media moves against City are also moves against UEFA, putting us in a position where we have to taken on UEFA in court.

Whichever way that one works out the Cartel clubs are better off either we are forced out for a while or they get a new UEFA with a new ex-champions and historically significant clubs league competition for the chosen few.

 

[RyanP3609]

Theres an article in the mirror (not going to quote the link) by Stan Collymore that is beyond laughable..

Gave the Utd treble winner 9.9/10
Gave the Arsenal invincible's 'just short of that'.. though no number given

City treble winners 5/10. (He said us winning the prem was 2 or 3 out of 10 this season)

Haha he evens says Utd and Liverpool spending in the past way more than their rivals at the time has no bearing on his decision...

"I know there’ll be plenty of people saying, ‘But Stan, United have the highest-paid player in the league’, or, ‘Liverpool and United both spent more money than their rivals when they were dominating and nobody said anything about that’.

But Manchester United got to be Manchester United by making very good decisions regularly over a long period of time. The same goes for Liverpool and the other historically big clubs around the world".

So everyone, it's fine for Utd to spend what they had done in the past and get a near perfect score for their treble cos "they made good decisions".

Liverpool spending away.. that's fiiiiiiine.

City winning 1st UK treble? Easy mate we've got money. It's all down to history now obviously.

God hes an odious ****.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

“But Manchester United got to be Manchester United by making very good decisions regularly over a long period of time. The same goes for Liverpool and the other historically big clubs around the world".

This is a lie.

They got to dominate financially (and concomitantly on the pitch) in the way they did, by loading the dice in their favour in the late seventies through to the early nineties, with a series of (principally) enforced and (exclusively) self-serving steps designed to concentrate more and more money towards the top of the English game, at a point in time when they happened to be loitering in the general vicinity. A form of financial doping, if you will. This is both manifest and well-documented. Anyone who fails to appreciate this has a grossly deficient knowledge of football history, is sinfully stupid, or most likely, both.

The landscape of Mansour and Abramovich was forged by likes of united and Liverpool when they elected to monetise the sport. They did not stop to consider the consequences of their actions when they were wanking themselves into a frenzy about shirt sales in Malaysia.

No-one forced them to do this and anyone who now describes that as a “good decision” is a fool, and an egregiously bitter one to boot.

 

[RyanP3609]

This is a lie.

They got to dominate financially (and concomitantly on the pitch) in the way they did, by loading the dice in their favour in the late seventies through to the early nineties, with a series of (principally) enforced and (exclusively) self-serving steps designed to concentrate more and more money towards the top of the English game, at a point in time when they happened to be loitering in the general vicinity. A form of financial doping, if you will. This is both manifest and well-documented. Anyone who fails to appreciate this has a grossly deficient knowledge of football history, is sinfully stupid, or most likely, both.

The landscape of Mansour and Abramovich was forged by likes of united and Liverpool when they elected to monetise the sport. They did not stop to consider the consequences of their actions when they were wanking themselves into a frenzy about shirt sales in Malaysia.

No-one forced them to do this and anyone who now describes that as a “good decision” is a fool, and an egregiously bitter one to boot.

Succinctly summed up in that final sentence Haha. Collymore chatting his usual blinkered garbage isnt it!

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

This is a lie.

They got to dominate financially (and concomitantly on the pitch) in the way they did, by loading the dice in their favour in the late seventies through to the early nineties, with a series of (principally) enforced and (exclusively) self-serving steps designed to concentrate more and more money towards the top of the English game, at a point in time when they happened to be loitering in the general vicinity. A form of financial doping, if you will. This is both manifest and well-documented. Anyone who fails to appreciate this has a grossly deficient knowledge of football history, is sinfully stupid, or most likely, both.

The landscape of Mansour and Abramovich was forged by likes of united and Liverpool when they elected to monetise the sport. They did not stop to consider the consequences of their actions when they were wanking themselves into a frenzy about shirt sales in Malaysia.

No-one forced them to do this and anyone who now describes that as a “good decision” is a fool, and an egregiously bitter one to boot.

Wanking oneself into a frenzy is one of life's great pleasure's.

 

[daztrueblue91]

Whenever the subject of the media comes up, it always reminds me of a quote by Hitler on propaganda. "The purpose of propaganda is to convince the masses. Their slowness of understanding needs time to absorb information. Only constant repetition will finally succeed in imprinting an idea on the mind".

It's scary the power that some of these cretins have. The amount of lies they peddle that people refuse to challenge or simply believe is staggering.

The media caused Raheem Sterling to be booed up and down the country for the past three years by creating a negative public image of him
The media have airbrushed United and Liverpool's heavy spending in the 80s and 90s to initially gain success from history
The media have airbrushed the fact that Pep took over a Barca side who finished 3rd and a City side who finish 4th into a narrative that he only takes over all conquering sides

 

[Metalartin]

Was this mentioned here on Saturday?

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...dona-children-divorce-diego-maradona-daughter

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Wanking oneself into a frenzy is one of life's great pleasure's.

I respectfully agree.

 

[davek1808]

This is a lie.

They got to dominate financially (and concomitantly on the pitch) in the way they did, by loading the dice in their favour in the late seventies through to the early nineties, with a series of (principally) enforced and (exclusively) self-serving steps designed to concentrate more and more money towards the top of the English game, at a point in time when they happened to be loitering in the general vicinity. A form of financial doping, if you will. This is both manifest and well-documented. Anyone who fails to appreciate this has a grossly deficient knowledge of football history, is sinfully stupid, or most likely, both.

The landscape of Mansour and Abramovich was forged by likes of united and Liverpool when they elected to monetise the sport. They did not stop to consider the consequences of their actions when they were wanking themselves into a frenzy about shirt sales in Malaysia.

No-one forced them to do this and anyone who now describes that as a “good decision” is a fool, and an egregiously bitter one to boot.

There's lies, lies and damned lies and then there's Stan fucking doggymore.

 

[Silvas' left eyebrow]

Anyone heard or read anything penned by the informed and articulate ALYSON RUDD since our English clean sweep. Or is she keeping her powder dry until after the cham pions league trophy has a new home.......

I do love her even , unbiased input .....

 

[Manchester_lalala]

Theres an article in the mirror (not going to quote the link) by Stan Collymore that is beyond laughable..

Gave the Utd treble winner 9.9/10
Gave the Arsenal invincible's 'just short of that'.. though no number given

City treble winners 5/10. (He said us winning the prem was 2 or 3 out of 10 this season)

Haha he evens says Utd and Liverpool spending in the past way more than their rivals at the time has no bearing on his decision...

"I know there’ll be plenty of people saying, ‘But Stan, United have the highest-paid player in the league’, or, ‘Liverpool and United both spent more money than their rivals when they were dominating and nobody said anything about that’.

But Manchester United got to be Manchester United by making very good decisions regularly over a long period of time. The same goes for Liverpool and the other historically big clubs around the world".

So everyone, it's fine for Utd to spend what they had done in the past and get a near perfect score for their treble cos "they made good decisions".

Liverpool spending away.. that's fiiiiiiine.

City winning 1st UK treble? Easy mate we've got money. It's all down to history now obviously.

God hes an odious ****.

He knows he gets an reaction from City fans, that’s exactly why he comes out with articles like this. He’s made it to obvious there by giving us a 5/10.

 

[davek1808]

Anyone heard or read anything penned by the informed and articulate ALYSON RUDD since our English clean sweep. Or is she keeping her powder dry until after the cham pions league trophy has a new home.......

I do love her even , unbiased input .....

Only some shit about who she's flicked her bean about the last decade.

 

[RyanP3609]

He knows he gets an reaction from City fans, that’s exactly why he comes out with articles like this. He’s made it to obvious there by giving us a 5/10.

Yeah definitely. It's why I didn't want to quote the link. Just made me laugh the attempt trolling. Its not even trying to hide it anymore just flat out bullshit.

 

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

This is a lie.

They got to dominate financially (and concomitantly on the pitch) in the way they did, by loading the dice in their favour in the late seventies through to the early nineties, with a series of (principally) enforced and (exclusively) self-serving steps designed to concentrate more and more money towards the top of the English game, at a point in time when they happened to be loitering in the general vicinity. A form of financial doping, if you will. This is both manifest and well-documented. Anyone who fails to appreciate this has a grossly deficient knowledge of football history, is sinfully stupid, or most likely, both.

The landscape of Mansour and Abramovich was forged by likes of united and Liverpool when they elected to monetise the sport. They did not stop to consider the consequences of their actions when they were wanking themselves into a frenzy about shirt sales in Malaysia.

No-one forced them to do this and anyone who now describes that as a “good decision” is a fool, and an egregiously bitter one to boot.

Are you seriously questioning one of the great thinkers of the modern game (surely soon to be) Sir Stanley of Collymore?