Media Discussion - 2023/24

[blue b4 the moon]

I’d forgotten that Tony Vaughan even existed

Wish I had.

 

[paulchapo]

I’d forgotten that Tony Vaughan even existed

He was one of the players that helped us limp over the line to.promotion but yes he wasn't very good. A City fan too apparently.

 

[Rochdale Blue]

football insider talk bollocks regularary

If Wyness is typical of the senior officials, past and present at Everton, then it's little wonder the club is in such a mess.

 

[citizen_maine]

I guess that's why I'd sooner he didn't mention them then.
It's a City press conference, not a rag one.

"Pep scared to speak about rivals United"

 

[Rochdale Blue]

I only read the comments, especially when United get beat. :-) I never read an article. Now they want you to pay £4.99 to get access to their premium (United) football articles. I don’t click on their ads either.

Premium rag articles?
How can they possibly arse lick even more and charge a fiver for it.
Most of the Mail articles front and back page seem to be aimed at a growing American readership, so maybe that's the target audience.

 

[Rochdale Blue]

Won’t be allowed to happen on the Klopp Farewell Tour

The Klopptanic has already been sunk by iceberg Pep, but it seems bingo doesn't want to go down with the ship.

 

[pauls]

Not really one of our greats was he!
The only thing I really remember about him was a last minute winner he scored against Bradford the season we got relegated to the old 2nd (proper 3rd) Division.
My other memory that game was the match day programme giving a mention to one of my favourite 90s Rock bands Terrorvision, who were from Bradford (shame about Tequila though!!)

My memory of him is tryna catch fat Bob at Wembley and failing miserably!

 

[1961_vintage]

I wonder how much the rags paid for henry winter.

 

[pauls]

I wonder how much the rags paid for henry winter.

They paid 30m to Dipperpool for him !

 

[Chris in London]

Premium rag articles?
How can they possibly arse lick even more and charge a fiver for it.
Most of the Mail articles front and back page seem to be aimed at a growing American readership, so maybe that's the target audience.

I don’t know which is worse - the prospect that there are rags out there who will pay to read this shite or the fact that the mail obviously thinks there are