Media Discussion - 2023/24

[bluealf]

Theres a report on there, has been for an hour.

Ah, I see it now, a picture of Pep looking miserable and a heading of treble winning Man City can improve.

Still, it is a report.

 

[Elbow beards]

Ah, I see it now, a picture of Pep looking miserable and a heading of treble winning Man City can improve.

Still, it is a report.

I must admit I nearly missed due to the headline and picture.

 

[heslops barnet]

Ah, I see it now, a picture of Pep looking miserable and a heading of treble winning Man City can improve.

Still, it is a report.

Not title contenders like the scum then?

 

[heslops barnet]

I must admit I nearly missed due to the headline and picture.

And being at the bottom….

 

[jrb]

Contrast and compare how both match headlines on the main BBC Football website page were reported. And the pictures used. At least they’ve added Treble winners in the headline.

Only when you click on the City article do you get this picture.



Note. There’s no journalist attached to City‘s article. No doubt Stone is still on his TV licence funded jolly in New York?

 

[bluealf]

Not title contenders like the scum then?

Build them up and then we'll knock them down again lol

 

[Mr Fraser]

Theres a report on there, has been for an hour.

Looks like a generic PA report rather than one by a senior football correspondent who watched the game

 

[Centurions]

Looks like a generic PA report rather than one by a senior football correspondent who watched the game

There's some weird grasping of straws goes on in this thread.

 

[Blueboy73]

Looks like a generic PA report rather than one by a slimey Rag fanboy wanker who watched the game as part of an all-expenses jolly paid for by the licence fee payer

Edited for accuracy

 

[jrb]

And you Stones. You freeloading **** on our TV licence money.