chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 23,572
LolNot Paul Nolan is it?
LolNot Paul Nolan is it?
Not Paul Nolan is it?
Next time Tarquin starts mouthing off, just show him this.The type who are small-minded enough to be brainwashed by the fact that 115 charges means we MUST be guilty of something, and even if only non-cooperstion, that would confirm that we're guilty of the rest, and automatically get loads of points off/relegated/titles expunged.
And they are the ones whose teeth will gnash the most as they struggle to comprehend how 'no relegation/points deductions' could be possible. (Simpleton amswer: brown envelopes)
Got one such gooner in my locals.
He gets livid and just tries to interrupt and shout you down when you show him any other alternative outcome.
I find it's better to just leave him to his 12 pints a day utopian haze.
I think that's because the match was mostly about Chelsea not taking their chances and winning the match?BBC football article is mostly about Chelsea not taking their chances and winning the match.
The outcry from rival fans every time city win a football game is mental. 115!
Success breeds contempt, if it wasn't 115 it would be something else. TBF I wasn't up for singing the praises of the Rags in the 90's!The outcry from rival fans every time city win a football game is mental. 115!
I've stopped listening to it, Chris Sutton is a fucking boring cockhead, hates us with a passion and always wants to piss on our parade.City fan on 606 slagging Haarland off and wanting him sold, on the day we qualified for the FA Cup Final! Jesus Wept.