Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Greenwood is a piss poor example, as whilst I’ve never called him a rapist there is plainly evidence in the public domain which clearly establishes (at the very least) there would be a civil case to answer. And I would stand in front of anyone and say that.

What is the equivalent evidence in the public domain in relation to City?
There was "evidence" in the public domain though, albeit that consisted of a handful of selective emails that suggested that we might have broken FFP rules. That's why UEFA investigated, and CAS confirmed they had a legitimate basis for doing so.
 
There was "evidence" in the public domain though, albeit that consisted of a handful of selective emails that suggested that we might have broken FFP rules. That's why UEFA investigated, and CAS confirmed they had a legitimate basis for doing so.
I said equivalent evidence.

Are you suggesting those doctored emails are equivalent to the tape of what appears to be Greenwood having sex with a female who is telling him to stop?

I didn’t bring Greenwood into the debate. It was a preposterous and foolish example.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.