Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
mattcity5 said:
Only gets referenced with Klopp too. Does Pep not get the city? Im pretty sure he does, but it never gets mentioned. Nor does it for any single other manager anywhere. Ever.
Click to expand...
Yeah. They mentioned something about some do gooder thing Mrs Klopp in Formby. Fucking Formby! The people’s place.

Then said about because Klopp will eat in a cafe or shows he gets the people and the city.

Scouse twats.
 
domalino said:
Without reading the whole piece, I actually think Kay's view in the tweet is not unreasonable for a non-City fan.

The players and the manager are undisputedly fantastic and the best ever. The accountants might have broken some rules to get an "unfair" advantage.

I feel like we should make an effort to seperate what are reasonable takes from a rival fan who has no reason to believe Soriano or Khaldoon when they say it's all bollocks and we'll be cleared, and obviously shite takes from the likes of Harris, Carragher etc.
Click to expand...
I've just been for a lunchtime walk round Heaton Park and was thinking this subject through. Yes, superficially, you can see his point and as I said earlier in the thread, the Mancini contract, and the fact some players got paid money they were owed, from Fordham rather than City, doesn't diminish the achievements under Pep. It certainly doesn't impact the results or performances of other clubs.

Chelsea and united have spent vast amounts of money, yet haven't come close to replicating the level of success we've had in the last 7 seasons, so there's clearly more to it than simply spending money. Like any business, it's about what you spend it on and how you marshal the resources you accumulate through that spending. It's refreshing to see someone acknowledge that, albeit maybe a bit grudgingly.

But it's the media who have parrotted this incessant narrative about "asterisks" and our success being "tainted", and Kay has to mention that, in the all too familiar context of assuming the club is guilty, when CAS showed otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.