Media Discussion - 2023/24

[Chris in London]

‘They’re Back’

That’s okay.

They’ll be off again soon.

 

[PPT]

I have come to the conclusion that there is only one thing more disliked by the media in this sorry 'state' of ours than Manchester City, and that is any sporting domination by Manchester City.
I was puzzled by the pro rag lexicon of Shearer during the game. When did he become such a tubthumper for the rags?
That 2nd penalty shout being described as good defending, just using his strength? Then saying the opposite about the challenge on poundland Haaland at the other end says it all.
The media can't have domination in the league. The English game is sold on its competitive field. If you have City winning too much it spoils the brand, which in turn dilutes the brand, which risks viewers turning away from it.......and THAT is why we see so many media cunts down playing our brilliance.
City winning everything is bad for their careers. The media must see a close competition or their whole product becomes stale.
On the upside, I believe this negativity will happen to any team that dominates from now on. Broadcasters, journalists, industry officials, and social media nobs, will all need engagement. When that drops their income drops.
And you don't fuck with someone's butty without kickback!!!!

If United or Liverpool dominate for the next 10 years the media would absolutely love it. Guaranteed

 

[burning blue soul]

If United or Liverpool dominate for the next 10 years the media would absolutely love it. Guaranteed

Only if it didn't cause 'the product' damage.

 

[burning blue soul]

You can guarantee if the rags liverpool or even arsenal dominate there would be no such negativity

There's only one guarentee, and that's income stream.
If it drops, or becomes at risk, they will go for the throat of anything that jeopardises it.

 

[jrb]

Avoiding it until next season.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

I have come to the conclusion that there is only one thing more disliked by the media in this sorry 'state' of ours than Manchester City, and that is any sporting domination by Manchester City.
I was puzzled by the pro rag lexicon of Shearer during the game. When did he become such a tubthumper for the rags?
That 2nd penalty shout being described as good defending, just using his strength? Then saying the opposite about the challenge on poundland Haaland at the other end says it all.
The media can't have domination in the league. The English game is sold on its competitive field. If you have City winning too much it spoils the brand, which in turn dilutes the brand, which risks viewers turning away from it.......and THAT is why we see so many media cunts down playing our brilliance.
City winning everything is bad for their careers. The media must see a close competition or their whole product becomes stale.
On the upside, I believe this negativity will happen to any team that dominates from now on. Broadcasters, journalists, industry officials, and social media nobs, will all need engagement. When that drops their income drops.
And you don't fuck with someone's butty without kickback!!!!

I suspect that any miraculous domination by the rags or dippers would be actually be greeted in the most positive manner possible by our " highly principled and discerning " media whores.

Whores follow the money, and rags / dippers have the largest following of dumb punters just begging to be robbed.

 

[burning blue soul]

I suspect that any miraculous domination by the rags or dippers would be actually be greeted in the most positive manner possible by our highly principled and discerning media whores.

Whores follow the money, and rags / dippers have the largest following of dumb punters just begging to be robbed.

I don't believe that is true with modern media. The whole industry is built on confrontation and challenge. That's what sells.
But, I hope to never find out.

 

[Winchester]

I have come to the conclusion that there is only one thing more disliked by the media in this sorry 'state' of ours than Manchester City, and that is any sporting domination by Manchester City.
I was puzzled by the pro rag lexicon of Shearer during the game. When did he become such a tubthumper for the rags?
That 2nd penalty shout being described as good defending, just using his strength? Then saying the opposite about the challenge on poundland Haaland at the other end says it all.
The media can't have domination in the league. The English game is sold on its competitive field. If you have City winning too much it spoils the brand, which in turn dilutes the brand, which risks viewers turning away from it.......and THAT is why we see so many media cunts down playing our brilliance.
City winning everything is bad for their careers. The media must see a close competition or their whole product becomes stale.
On the upside, I believe this negativity will happen to any team that dominates from now on. Broadcasters, journalists, industry officials, and social media nobs, will all need engagement. When that drops their income drops.
And you don't fuck with someone's butty without kickback!!!!

Shearer and Mowbray on BBC Were a disgrace

 

[Tanzeylee]

Only if it didn't cause 'the product' damage.

The rags and dippers are the product that's why there's so many cock suckers in the industry

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

I don't believe that is true with modern media. The whole industry is built on confrontation and challenge. That's what sells.
But, I hope to never find out.

No problem with you having a different opinion, but if there is so much " confrontation and challenge " within the modern media , I don't see evidence of any of them having the courage to offer a different opinion on the likelihood of City's guilt under the PL charge of aka " the 115 charges ".

That would appear to be " what sells " in the eyes of the media .