SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Unless your Man U or the UK Gov.As had been mentioned by others knowing that they were losing £40m you don’t then go & spend £150m.
Both believe in borrowing heavily to subsidize what you have to spend.
Unless your Man U or the UK Gov.As had been mentioned by others knowing that they were losing £40m you don’t then go & spend £150m.
You sure it wasn't Stephen Warnock - difficult to tell..............Sue Smith back on Sky.
Biggest rag arse licker in the media.
It’s so obvious she’s instructed to suck them off in every sentence.
It's an empty threat.
Both the Trade Marks Act and IP Regulations make offences out for manufacture, distribution, sale and retail of goods containing Trade Marks (club & sponsors logos) or sufficiently imitating (looking like, doesn't have to be an exact copy) the club shirts in question.
Owning or wearing one is not an offence.
That was also the weekend the Premier league brought a new rule in.This time last year there was a trophy parade at Islington town hall.
You sure it wasn't Stephen Warnock - difficult to tell..............
One Rag apologist and one Dipper apologist.They literally agree with each other about everything.
It’s fucking nauseating.
Or 12 minutes if they haven't scored in the 9.That was also the weekend the Premier league brought a new rule in.
9 mins injury time if the Arse are losing