Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
2 Liverpool fans who happen to lecture on law in Sheffield want the PL to be sure they have proper evidence to convict city. Their feeling is that the charges were brought to show that PL execs are hard cunts who take no shit…and prior to the govt bringing in an external body to take over PL housekeeping relating to regulating members.
Cult members?

This won't end well for them if the PL close down their investigation.
 
I didn’t think it was strange at all. Just providing some expert opinion on the enormity of the charges and consequences……should the charges not be we’ll thought out and evidenced.

Personally, I hope we take the PL to the cleaners and bankrupt them in court. I also hope we dish the dirt on other PL clubs and ask at what stage their investigations are at……we all know the answer to that


I actually thought that was the fairest discussion on the charges I’ve seen.
 
Clause (c) clearly rules out Rashfords goal, as he was obstructing Akanji’s view of the ball. This clause doesn’t only apply to goalkeepers as most pundits seem to think. How Webb could ignore such a clearly stated clause implies an astonishing level of incompetence, or, of course, clear bias, ignoring the clauses that don’t agree with his pre-formed decision.
Bingo
 
Clause (c) clearly rules out Rashfords goal, as he was obstructing Akanji’s view of the ball. This clause doesn’t only apply to goalkeepers as most pundits seem to think. How Webb could ignore such a clearly stated clause implies an astonishing level of incompetence, or, of course, clear bias, ignoring the clauses that don’t agree with his pre-formed decision.
Institutionalised bias.
 
So many pundits, fans and ex players saying Akanji was in the goalkeepers line of site of the ball. When Ake headed the ball Akanji was yards to the keepers right. That is why Leno had to dive to try and make a save. IMO whether Akanji was there or not he would not have got to the ball.

However, Akanji moved his legs to avoid touching the ball and it is this movement that seems to be the crux of causing Leno to instinctively adjust his dive thinking Leno was going to divert it.

How far does a player have to be right or left of a keeper to be deemed not interfering with play? I think Phil took the corner....if he had taken his cock out after crossing it would he be offside for distracting Leno during his dive?
Kyle loves this theory.
 
Webb is increasingly digging a hole he will not be able to get out of. The level of intelligence for all those running PYGMOL and VAR is woefully low. They seem to base their decisions on bias and popularity and the difference between the two rugby codes and footballs VAR reviews is similar to the difference between primary school children and university graduates. The football lot are thick as pigshit when it comes to following the LOTG and it is confirmed when heard in the audio tapes. The football lot are an embarrassment to the game of football.
 
Can someone please summarise, as I flatly refuse to give that Rag biased toilet paper, or any other Reach plc publication internet clicks?
Apparently the court of public opinion (mostly rags, dippers and Tarquins) voted 3 to1 in a poll that we are guilty. Perhaps we should let the same lunatics decide innocence or guilt in serious crime cases to clear up the backlog. This would also save the accused paying a fortune to the now redundant dodgy lawyers.
 
2 Liverpool fans who happen to lecture on law in Sheffield want the PL to be sure they have proper evidence to convict city. Their feeling is that the charges were brought to show that PL execs are hard cunts who take no shit…and prior to the govt bringing in an external body to take over PL housekeeping relating to regulating members.
The horse has bolted on "being sure they have evidence to convict" the club. The process is in place. What are they going to do? Say "Sorry, we were just joking. All the charges are off". The time for that was before they referred the alleged breaches to the panel.

And, as for "any outcome causing a mutiny", what does that even mean? If we are found guilty and relegated to the Conference with the senior executives in jail, exactly who is going to mutiny and from what?

As for the article, it was poorly written and most of it, apart from the above, fairly neutral. Bit of a nothing-burger really.
 
Matthew 'City fans are vicious rats' Syed, ladies and gentlemen...

Just posted this in the thread about Rubiales in the General Football Forum.

I can say, as both an English and Spanish football obsessive that has followed the women’s team’s plight for some time before the latest incident, that Rubiales is a misogynistic, fascist, corrupt, sex-pest, man-child that deserves ousting for many, many reasons.

And Matthew Syed is a vile misogynist hypocritical **** that loves to fervently defend people like Rubiales.
 
Can someone please summarise, as I flatly refuse to give that Rag biased toilet paper, or any other Reach plc publication internet clicks?
I have just read it and can be summarised thus:

It includes no new information of any kind and is merely an article tenuously written around two Liverpool lecturers general statements about proceedings, intended to remind readers that Manchester City have been charged by the Premier League for “serious financial misconduct”.
 
I have just read it and can be summarised thus:

It includes no new information of any kind and is merely an article tenuously written around two Liverpool lecturers general statements about proceedings, intended to remind readers that Manchester City have been charged by the Premier League for “serious financial misconduct”.
I love the line ‘numerous clubs fighting to be the best’ when the truth is it‘s numerous clubs fighting to stop City being the best.
There‘s a world of difference.
 
Just posted this in the thread about Rubiales in the General Football Forum.

I can say, as both an English and Spanish football obsessive that has followed the women’s team’s plight for some time before the latest incident, that Rubiales is a misogynistic, fascist, corrupt, sex-pest, man-child that deserves ousting for many, many reasons.

And Matthew Syed is a vile misogynist hypocritical **** that loves to fervently defend people like Rubiales.
Syed's answer - Yes, Yes, Yes, but apart from that, why shouldn't they be running a women's football team.

I knew he was a ****, but he's really going for the full monty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top