The BBC actively promotes toxic comments about City on its website. No attempt is made to moderate accusations accusing us of being cheats even though our case is currently being considered by an independent panel. There are no caveats on the comments. It is totally dishonest and unfair.Let’s face it, it’s a ritual with rival fans to go on there and plaster it with all the cheats, 115 bollocks on any City HYS. Rags, dippers, Arse, Spurs all pile on and the BBC facilitate it with their choices of opening an HYS and often a headline or framed question. It’s like people on here when the rags lose saying “I’m going over to the caff ” - only they do it on a fucking industrial scale. It’s not a lack of intelligence it’s just deliberate and targeted bile and shows their level of pain. Anyone with half a brain knows it’s sheer bullshit - including our beloved (joke) publicly-owned broadcaster, but the fact they actively encourage it, is a fucking disgrace.
people buy it tho thats the problem
I read Barney Ronay's report of the Liverpool win at Palace.National sports media gaslighting.
I thought the scousers were as lucky as us not to blow it yesterday but the media have proclaimed them champions.
The BBC actively promotes toxic comments about City on its website. No attempt is made to moderate accusations accusing us of being cheats even though our case is currently being considered by an independent panel. There are no caveats on the comments. It is totally dishonest and unfair.
It is no coincidence that in most circles they are known as the British Bullshit CorporationOne of the worst culprits - using public funding to feed the ignorant and biased out there.
Their " reputation " for impartiality courtesy of BBC Sports is in tatters .
It is no coincidence that in most circles they are known as the British Bullshit Corporation
The BBC actively promotes toxic comments about City on its website. No attempt is made to moderate accusations accusing us of being cheats even though our case is currently being considered by an independent panel. There are no caveats on the comments. It is totally dishonest and unfair.
Ducker in the Telegraph put the boot into City and Pep this morning whilst his colleague Dean in the adjacent reportwas glowing about Arsenals heroic come back. We might as well just concede it is now a two horse race!The narrative is just set different when it comes to city, we get lucky, other teams grind out wins when they aint playing well, when teams dont score against us they are wasteful, when teams dont score against the rags, dippers and arse it is good defending, you only have to look at yesterday.
Arsenal were playing southampton at home, went behind and southampton hit the post but the headline was saka inspires arsenal to come back win despite arsenals equaliser coming from southampton attempting to play out from the back. We played fulham at home who are currently sixth having lost once all season and only conceded one goal per game and our headline is city punish wasteful fulham, see the difference, the headline about us is honest but nods to the point we got lucky, it doesnt with arsenal.
Also on sky there is another headline that says liverpool serious title contenders as city show flaws when you look behind it tho the reality is that liverpool have played ONE team in the top ten so far who they lost two whereas our flaws are apparently only winning 3-2 against a team who have conceded only one goal a game all season while missing two of our best players and coming off the back of a european game.