Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
What a desperate small time twat. Where are your beloved rags then shit for brains? You'd be better employed finding out who the fuck are FCSB who the rags play in the Europeless League.
Best description I can think of is , fkin shitcnut of the highest order Fkin shitcnut
 
at least with the world series it has a legitimate reason as it was named after a newspaper called the world, the super bowl world champs and champs league are complete pish tho
Maybe maybe not
The New York World newspaper
A popular story is that the World Series was named after the New York World newspaper, which sponsored the early championship games. However, there's no evidence that the newspaper had any part in organizing the matches, or that they lent their name to the series.
 
Used to go to winter cricket nets in Withington in 1985. David Herd also went to the sessions and told me that Mark Hughes was going to Barcelona, not that I was arsed, the following season and had bought a car off him on the strength of the transfer. He was OK although not the best batsman.
Fuck me I used to go to the same winter nets in the 90s.
 
Barmpot Ronnie or whatever he’s called in the Guardian waxing limply about the usual. Zzz

That fella has been re hashing the same article for years. I'm convinced he just sticks it through Chat GPT. He's a parody of himself at this point.

I read his latest word soup and it made me laugh that he referenced part of our legal defence will be citing the PL case as based on 'inadmissible evidence' yet Ronay continues to legitimise the emails as 'leaked' as if the hacker was some kind of noble whistle-blower, and not a career criminal who is currently in jail for extortion.
 
Another day, another story by he red top loving BBC.

Man City case 'moral reward' for Football Leaks hacker, lawyer claimMan City case 'moral reward' for Football Leaks hacker, lawyer claims​

Nothing of course in this report about doctored emails of course. I hope should we win this case we take off the kids gloves we have had on since the takeover and go hard on rivals, media outlets and individuals, any slander,accusations of cheating will be met with the strongest legal action and the club start issuing banning orders for some of the media. The soft approach since the takeover has not had any effect, for example we have had chances to call the Dippers out many times over the years for coach attacks, Klopp's comments, illegal hacking, objects thrown by their fans injuring ours and have never taken them to task over it yet the claim we wrote Kopites on a toilet door (as if we would call them Kopites), accused of tragedy chanting despite it only being the truthful its never your fault chant and its been all over the media
Er, there's loads in there about him being a bit of a twat and a criminal
 
That fella has been re hashing the same article for years. I'm convinced he just sticks it through Chat GPT. He's a parody of himself at this point.

I read his latest word soup and it made me laugh that he referenced part of our legal defence will be citing the PL case as based on 'inadmissible evidence' yet Ronay continues to legitimise the emails as 'leaked' as if the hacker was some kind of noble whistle-blower, and not a career criminal who is currently in jail for extortion.
Like all the English media Ronay ignored the Pinto trial. He was convicted of multiple offences and not a single charge related to City. He admitted trying to extort hundreds of thousands of pounds as part of a plea bargain. He is a career criminal. People like Ronay are fundamentally dishonest. They make no attempt to report the truth.
 
The BBC should have been banned from the ground some time ago but i have no idea how the mail have not been. Its been years of nothing but negative and biased crap from them.
Led by Holt, Herbert, Ladyman, Raith Al Wotsisname. Slimeballs imo each and everyone of them.
 
Barmpot Ronnie or whatever he’s called in the Guardian waxing limply about the usual. Zzz
It's a typical Ronay article and nothing hugely new. The only point I agree with him is that whatever the outcome - City win the case or City lose the case - the PL is f*cked either way and it's all of their own making. I'm not sure I agree with his third outcome, some sort of compromise. The overwhelming impression is that we want this put to bed once and for all and won't accept a compromise. And if the 'irrefutable evidence' is as stated, why should we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top