Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
cupsforcockups said:
Ffs just saw ssn saying this about Utd. Manchesters finest they hammered city. This bollocks just before they lost to spurs
Click to expand...
Mate nobody is pretending the Rags are Manchester's finest or that us gifting them 2 goals in the last 5 minutes is the definition of them hammering us!
 
Fordyboy46 said:
Slight annoyance, on the BBC sports app on the press conferences story, three managers are pictured, a smiling Arteta, Wolves new manager with a cheeky grin and yes Pep with his head in his hands. Still no bias though hey?
Click to expand...


It's the subliminal water torture that gets through mate, even people who aren't fans of football think we murder Donkeys and set fire to Dolphins.
 
cheekybids said:
There are Alyson Rudds on every page of every paper providing opinions on policies, wars, finance, welfare etc

They are know nowt cunts & we will all have been duped on subjects we know less about. Newspapers stopped being relevant once the chippy no longer used them.
Click to expand...
100%.
People should understand that most journalists have no actual qualifications or experience in any subject apart from English lit. They are sometimes good at persuasive writing where it makes them sound insightful but when you critically think about it, it's stupid as shit.
The top political journalist at the BBC is a wealthy/privately educated women who studied history with a focus on Scottish rebellions under the Bruces and now apparently that qualifies her to interview all the top cabinet posts.
The top football writer at the BBC has no experience in football, no coaching experience, no sports science experience, no playing experience. But we are told his views every week and he gets to question Pep Guardiola.
The whole system is stupid as fuck. You've got people who don't know what they're talking about, writing about people who do, and telling them what they should be doing better
 
Damocles said:
100%.
People should understand that most journalists have no actual qualifications or experience in any subject apart from English lit. They are sometimes good at persuasive writing where it makes them sound insightful but when you critically think about it, it's stupid as shit.
The top political journalist at the BBC is a wealthy/privately educated women who studied history with a focus on Scottish rebellions under the Bruces and now apparently that qualifies her to interview all the top cabinet posts.
The top football writer at the BBC has no experience in football, no coaching experience, no sports science experience, no playing experience. But we are told his views every week and he gets to question Pep Guardiola.
The whole system is stupid as fuck. You've got people who don't know what they're talking about, writing about people who do, and telling them what they should be doing better
Click to expand...

If only there was a score chart or a table of their views & predictions. I’ve never had a job where I have the luxury of being wrong all the time & still get paid. Imagine if Rudd was a financial advisor & she’s basically told you to sell all your stock in Pep & buy Thomas Franck…..
 
cheekybids said:
Looks expensive but pocket change to someone with a £16b fortune…..

What you say? He wants bankrupt governments to pay for it & not 1 media organisation has criticised the audacity of the Scruffy ****!
Click to expand...
Didn't Andy Burnham say a new "Wembley of the North" would be a great facility ?
If yes, is this grand new stadium going to be the new home of the Trafford Tramps ?
 
Well it had to be Stone or Jackson asking about the charges. Turns out it was that red **** Paradise. Vermin.
 
Damocles said:
100%.
People should understand that most journalists have no actual qualifications or experience in any subject apart from English lit. They are sometimes good at persuasive writing where it makes them sound insightful but when you critically think about it, it's stupid as shit.
The top political journalist at the BBC is a wealthy/privately educated women who studied history with a focus on Scottish rebellions under the Bruces and now apparently that qualifies her to interview all the top cabinet posts.
The top football writer at the BBC has no experience in football, no coaching experience, no sports science experience, no playing experience. But we are told his views every week and he gets to question Pep Guardiola.
The whole system is stupid as fuck. You've got people who don't know what they're talking about, writing about people who do, and telling them what they should be doing better
Click to expand...
Although Alyson Rudd did play for Orient and is a qualified coach and referee. Mind you, as she was born in Liverpool all that is completely negated by the slavish adherence to the way of the Cult……
 
Damocles said:
100%.
People should understand that most journalists have no actual qualifications or experience in any subject apart from English lit. They are sometimes good at persuasive writing where it makes them sound insightful but when you critically think about it, it's stupid as shit.
The top political journalist at the BBC is a wealthy/privately educated women who studied history with a focus on Scottish rebellions under the Bruces and now apparently that qualifies her to interview all the top cabinet posts.
The top football writer at the BBC has no experience in football, no coaching experience, no sports science experience, no playing experience. But we are told his views every week and he gets to question Pep Guardiola.
The whole system is stupid as fuck. You've got people who don't know what they're talking about, writing about people who do, and telling them what they should be doing better
Click to expand...
I agree but what is different now from the past? I grew up reading David Lacey in the Guardian and Bob Russell in the Mirror and Patrick Barclay and James Lawton etc.. I'm not sure what qualifications they had either but I'm pretty sure they would have worked their way up from junior level and the writing then was focused on the drama created by the game itself and the context in which it was played. There certainly didn't seem to be prec9nceived ideas or bias. Compared to the appallingly money oriented biased drivel we read nowadays.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top