M
M
Now youre just making things up. You have absolutely no idea whether KDB would be able to play his normal city game in this England side and you never will.
What I would say is England have a history of players not carrying their club form into international football, this is nothing new with sterling. You could also say the same about Messi, has he ever really carried his Barca form onto the international stage on a Regular basis, I’d say he hasn’t. On that basis would u drop Messi as well?
It's only opinions and some might say that describes you.
Best player in the 2014 world cup, especially in the Italy game.Ok, I imagine KDB would play his normal football. It seems odd you would think he wouldn't. If Messi wasn't playing well for Argentina then yes drop him, his name wont win you football matches will it? We moaned for years England persisted with Gerrard Lampard etc just because they were our best centre mids but clearly it didn't work for England yet when it comes to Sterling he has to play because of his club form. I agree many don't carry that form to their national sides but England just do not play to Sterlings strengths and that is why he looks half the player for them than he does us.
You are talking absolute shite there pal, I think you need to ignore who they both play for and judge them for England. Sterling plays differently for City and my points aren't about club football but for England. Define constant threat, do you mean getting into fantastic positions and not picking out a team mate? Creating a chance to balloon over the bar? it's all guff people say "constant threat" "looks dangerous" it doesn't even mean anything. He is superior to the three you just mentioned but you don't just pick the best club players - look at Germany with Sane. England have suffered before shoehorning the best talent instead of having a system. By all means defend Sterling, argue why he should start but to say all that and slate Rashford clearly shows you know zip about football.
I guess we disagree on who plays better for England. I would actually rather see sterling and rashford start ahead of Lingard and alli. Sterling and rashford both have their faults for England, but I’d much rather have that threat of sterling on the pitch than Lingard or alli. England without sterling have no one who can beat a man or really hurt a team with his directness and runs in behind. Yes he needs to improve his final delivery / finishing, but there is no one else who can open up and hurt defenses like he does.Ok, I imagine KDB would play his normal football. It seems odd you would think he wouldn't. If Messi wasn't playing well for Argentina then yes drop him, his name wont win you football matches will it? We moaned for years England persisted with Gerrard Lampard etc just because they were our best centre mids but clearly it didn't work for England yet when it comes to Sterling he has to play because of his club form. I agree many don't carry that form to their national sides but England just do not play to Sterlings strengths and that is why he looks half the player for them than he does us.
Can you get up those praising posts as i only recall one or 2 with a but..I don't relish it, as pointed out before I went on his thread many times this season praising him. People only pick out when I am critical. I can see positives in his game, just not for England maybe similar to Sane for Germany, not that I have watched them but many have said he didn't get picked because he doesn't perform for them which is mad considering the season he has had for us. Looking dangerous for me isn't a reason to start anybody although I appreciate there isn't a big pot of talent to pick from for England. Of course I want him to do well, madness to think otherwise.
I guess we disagree on who plays better for England. I would actually rather see sterling and rashford start ahead of Lingard and alli. Sterling and rashford both have their faults for England, but I’d much rather have that threat of sterling on the pitch than Lingard or alli. England without sterling have no one who can beat a man or really hurt a team with his directness and runs in behind. Yes he needs to improve his final delivery / finishing, but there is no one else who can open up and hurt defenses like he does.
Can you get up those praising posts as i only recall one or 2 with a but..
Also why does he have to take his city form to england ? another stick for you to beat him with it seems
No players take their club form into the national teams not even messi or sergio for reasons i'm sure you know ,try watching more of our players at the world cup,but you just like picking,what is your REAL problem with him? and those posts would be goodWhen I have watched him for England though he doesn't often do them things you list? You are talking about City Sterling rather than England Sterling but I agree I would happily have him and Rashford starting ahead of the players you mentioned.
Why does he have to take that form? Maybe because it is his job? The same way Rooney would get blasted for being a different player for England than he was at United.