Feel he's just being set up as the scapegoat for if we get knocked out as the media will just run with "well we got on board, listened to you lot and gave him a chance and he still didn't score like rashford so booooo"
I think it's the opposite, I think people are just trying to break up the anti-sterling stuff early because they don't want another Beckham scenario - and they really don't, not the sports journalists anyway.
Also a lot of it is getting behind the team, and good pundits pointing stuff out on big platforms. A lot of the foreign pundits have been singing his praises all tournament and I think it's just rubbing off on the English ones.
If he does end up missing a chance that puts England into the final or worse, then it's going to be a very long road back, but I don't think the sports journalists defending him can be accused of setting him up.