Media Thread 2017/18

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's every single pundit on all channels,all papers and talkshite,it's a lazy narrative that one starts and the others repeat,they have no more understanding of the way pep has us playing now than they did at the start,they have no interest in learning either
If we continue to play at the level we are I fully expect the to describe us as "an average team if you take out aguero, sane, sterling, Jesus, Silva and debruyne they would struggle to get results"! Lol
 
One of the lads on our footy team, a stokie, told me today we're playing the best football he's ever seen in the league. Perhaps the media does only influence minds in the uk?
 
Might seem something stupid but sky sports app never seem to prefer city. Yesterday pretty much every game was above ours on the menu despite ours being one of the best games. do it every week, have to look for us where as everyone else is obvious
 
It's every single pundit on all channels,all papers and talkshite,it's a lazy narrative that one starts and the others repeat,they have no more understanding of the way pep has us playing now than they did at the start,they have no interest in learning either

I disagree. It's not 'laziness' or a 'lack of understanding', but a pernicious and sinister ploy to have it all ways. When we lose, which we will at some point, they will be able to roll out their pre-baked narrative - "Look, we were right, they can't defend", regardless of whether other teams around - or most probably below - us, have lost and conceded more.

It's not lazy; it takes forethought, duplicity of character and an unrelenting and unending amount of front to continue with the bollocks that they spew.
 
I disagree. It's not 'laziness' or a 'lack of understanding', but a pernicious and sinister ploy to have it all ways. When we lose, which we will at some point, they will be able to roll out their pre-baked narrative - "Look, we were right, they can't defend", regardless of whether other teams around - or most probably below - us, have lost and conceded more.

It's not lazy; it takes forethought, duplicity of character and an unrelenting and unending amount of front to continue with the bollocks that they spew.
That as well
 
But hardly worth getting all riled up about, prior to the game we were top for alphabetical reason now goal difference. Reading this thread seems most go looking for anything to winge about, it's getting a bit boring now
Don't read the thread then if it's boring. Simples!!!! And I'm not getting riled up lol. It's a discussion thread, for... well, you know.... people to discuss things on. And if you don't think there is a media agenda then you must be a bit odd or just a very nice and over trusting person. But each to their own ;)))
 
Don't read the thread then if it's boring. Simples!!!! And I'm not getting riled up lol. It's a discussion thread, for... well, you know.... people to discuss things on. And if you don't think there is a media agenda then you must be a bit odd or just a very nice and over trusting person. But each to their own ;)))

I think some things are ridiculous that we moan abt.

I've no problem going after the most obvious biased ****s, the rag sycophant hacks. Herbert, Jackson, Bates, McDonnel just to name a few. I think counting how many rag stories to city ones each day in every paper does get boring.
 
I think some things are ridiculous that we moan abt.

I've no problem going after the most obvious biased ****s, the rag sycophant hacks. Herbert, Jackson, Bates, McDonnel just to name a few. I think counting how many rag stories to city ones each day in every paper does get boring.

I ask the question...Do other teams fans feel the same way that they don’t get a look in because of rag bias?
 
I ask the question...Do other teams fans feel the same way that they don’t get a look in because of rag bias?

As bad as it is to say It's clickbait mate, the more rag stories the more clicks. It's how it works.

Just like the 50 odd bbc fa cup matches theve had on the spin, They know the audience will dwarf any other game. That one doesn't sit well with me as we fund the fuckers. But I can see why they do it
 
10 goals without reply in 2 home games ,,,,, but but but the defence is suspect , Liverpool could have been 3 up before the REF ruined the game as a contest ,,, Palace bossed the first half and should have been ahead , Benteke outshone Aguero etc etc etc etc ,,,,,,, The hate oozes out of them .
 
Don't read the thread then if it's boring. Simples!!!! And I'm not getting riled up lol. It's a discussion thread, for... well, you know.... people to discuss things on. And if you don't think there is a media agenda then you must be a bit odd or just a very nice and over trusting person. But each to their own ;)))

Ah the old 'if you don't like it don't read it' response. As you say it is a discussion forum, but only if you agree is it.?

I only believe the media show bias to Utd over other clubs. I don't believe in an anti City agenda.

But if you believe every negative comment, however ridiculous, is part of a coordinated anti City agenda, across all media outlets then good for you.
 
Ah the old 'if you don't like it don't read it' response. As you say it is a discussion forum, but only if you agree is it.?

I only believe the media show bias to Utd over other clubs. I don't believe in an anti City agenda.

But if you believe every negative comment, however ridiculous, is part of a coordinated anti City agenda, across all media outlets then good for you.

Hold on. It was you who came in going on about it all getting a bit boring now.
You have some front, i'll give you that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top