M
M
manchester blue
Guest
The salient point that you omit Frank is that the number of pieces is of secondary importance to the tone. When it comes to united what you get is puff piece after puff piece after puff piece. When it comes to City however, the name of the game is, more often than not, negative stereotyping, or information that is misrepresented. Remember the BBC's expose on youth football in Manchester a couple of months ago, in which they tried to pass off Dave Horrocks - boss of Fletcher Moss Rangers and long time season ticket holder at the swamp - as a neutral, so that he could put the boot into City and St Bede's non-stop? I do......
You're right. The story is quite interesting and probably deserves some space but it's a line of more and more United promotions.
I watched something on line from Football Focus just now on the BBC. The pundit was discussing Jonny Evans. He said it would be a good move for Evans and he would play more than people think. There then followed a complete criticism of the defence despite playing only one game and the major weaknesses, i.e. Goalkeeper, fullbacks being addressed. Apparently there is still a question mark around the goalkeeper. This is just lazy broadcasting, repeating the narrative from last season which started with one heavy defeat and continued throughout the season, despite us being 4th best defensively at the end.
Looks like it's still going to be the same boring, non researched clichés from last season.