franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 11,146
Not a word on the BBC Sport website, not a word on The Guardian website. Ditto the Express.
This was all said about the Madrid match and then they all appeared.
Not a word on the BBC Sport website, not a word on The Guardian website. Ditto the Express.
Not a word on the BBC Sport website, not a word on The Guardian website. Ditto the Express.
This was all said about the Madrid match and then they all appeared.
It's 7.30am UK time.
Unless I can't see it, in which case I apologise, there is no report on our 3-0 win over Spurs on the main BBC Foootball page.
Not for one second do I think it would be any different if United had beaten Spurs 3-0, with Rashford scoring.
Come on Frank, smell the coffee. Apart from the smell, the Coffee is tasting more and more bitter.
I think I'll have an early morning cup of tea and read what the fans have to say about the performance on BM. That tastes much better. Refreshing, sweet and just right. Lovely.
Or I could read BBC United Sports, located at Mediacity in Salford, across Salford Quays from the Theatre of BBC Sports Dreams. There's a clue there, Frank. ;-)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football
Then again, I can f*** BBC Sport, the Daily Fail, the MUEN, the Daily Mirror, Sly Sports News, etc off and find the highlights of the match on another website and watch the match myself. That's one of the plus points about the interweb. Oh, News Now Manchester City isn't bad either. At least you can sift through the s*** and pick positive and unbiased articles from various other websites.
Just for you Frank. Who the f*** are the BBC Sport and Simon Stone?! Thank you to the person who posted the highlights on YouTube.
It is on the main sports page now. Under the banner City 'better than last season' in win over Spurs. Says 16 mins ago so added at 8:34.
Its on the football section, not the main home screen Frank.
My apologies should have said football. Seems an appropriate place to me. On the Express page now also.
It is on the main sports page now. Under the banner City 'better than last season' in win over Spurs. Says 16 mins ago so added at 8:34.
It's on the BBC Football page now. Uploaded at 08.30 am. I missed it as well when I logged on
Where? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport
Here! http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football 24 minutes ago. Ha!
It's already yesterday's chip paper football sports news.
I watched the highlights earlier this morning via BM. Read match reports via various news now Man City websites. Where was BBC Sports then?
It's f****ing s***, Frank! And on top of that we've got Simon Stone gritting his teeth, bashing his laptop keys, and trying to give a fair and unbiased report on the match. It must be killing him. But keep on manning the BBC Sports barricades. You're doing a wonderful job, Frank.
Frank, you can keep BBC Football. Enjoy it! :-? Thankfully the internet allows me and 100,000's of other City fans to get City match reports and articles from numerous other websites. I'm off to watch the match highlights again. And to make myself a cup of tea. :-)
But yet at 8:20 on a sunday morning you were searching for a City report on the BBC? Admit it you love the BBC as well :-).
More than appropriate but given the homepage is normally the place for major sports news im a little surprised it hasn't made that as well?
I mean and U15 United game made it there just the other day ;-)
Love it? No, but pay for it? Yes.
Given that i expect parity and unbiased, balanced reporting from an organisation that is publicly funded and does not rely on commercial revenue.
Apparently all that is in their charter......
I am starting to think I was at that U15 game the amount I have heard about it :-).
Seriously great performance but still only preseason friendlies. Pretty sure if we beat spurs in the league 3-0 it will make the sports page.
So if you expect parity why would you expect a city preseason friendly win to make the main sports page? What about all the other sides who have played friendlies, do they not deserve parity as well?
The BBC are always going to comment and always have on populist sports/stories. Its the reason we recrive so much publicity. Maybe less than United but more than 95 percent of clubs on the football pyramid.
People need to face up to the reality that a greater proportion of bbc and other media audience is interested in Utd than in us. (And maybe in some other teams too).
And it will remain so for some years until they are eclipsed where it matters, on the pitch and in the trophy room.
Bleating on about not being headline story etc and boycotting the BBC is laughably scouse and won't change anything. What the team delivers, over time, will.
That U15 piece scuttled your ship below the waterline Frank and you're desperately clinging to the only remaining piece of flotsam right now ;-)
Again, the BBC are not driven by the need for commercial revenue and have no need to become the same as those that are.
Whilst they ignore that and their own charter they will receive criticism for it.