Media Thread 2017/18

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
franksinatra said:
I am starting to think I was at that U15 game the amount I have heard about it :-).

Seriously great performance but still only preseason friendlies. Pretty sure if we beat spurs in the league 3-0 it will make the sports page.
Click to expand...
You do realise that the report of the rags u15's was for the supplementary cup as they were knocked out of the main competition
 
BBC1 Sports round up just now hasn't even mentioned it. Mentions for Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool with footage from each. Unbelievable. Or maybe not.
 
stan bowles said:
BBC1 Sports round up just now hasn't even mentioned it. Mentions for Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool with footage from each. Unbelievable. Or maybe not.
Click to expand...

Just par for the course but some on here will manage to try and defend it lol
 
Willie Wontie said:
People need to face up to the reality that a greater proportion of bbc and other media audience is interested in Utd than in us. (And maybe in some other teams too).

And it will remain so for some years until they are eclipsed where it matters, on the pitch and in the trophy room.

Bleating on about not being headline story etc and boycotting the BBC is laughably scouse and won't change anything. What the team delivers, over time, will.
Click to expand...

They want it now mate. Fuckin crave to be the headline.

How this shit festers in some folks heads is weird.

Day in day out searching how far up City are in the sports news & how big the column is.

Just enjoy how we play.
 
stan bowles said:
BBC1 Sports round up just now hasn't even mentioned it. Mentions for Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool with footage from each. Unbelievable. Or maybe not.
Click to expand...

Just saw that and rewinded it to check I didn't miss us, nope not a mention. Strange seeing it was 2 english clubs playing but not unexpected.
 
jrb said:
It's 7.30am UK time.

Unless I can't see it, in which case I apologise, there is no report on our 3-0 win over Spurs on the main BBC Foootball page.

Not for one second do I think it would be any different if United had beaten Spurs 3-0, with Rashford scoring.

Come on Frank, smell the coffee. Apart from the smell, the Coffee is tasting more and more bitter.

I think I'll have an early morning cup of tea and read what the fans have to say about the performance on BM. That tastes much better. Refreshing, sweet and just right. Lovely.

Or I could read BBC United Sports, located at Mediacity in Salford, across Salford Quays from the Theatre of BBC Sports Dreams. There's a clue there, Frank. ;-)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football

Then again, I can f*** BBC Sport, the Daily Fail, the MUEN, the Daily Mirror, Sly Sports News, etc off and find the highlights of the match on another website and watch the match myself. That's one of the plus points about the interweb. Oh, News Now Manchester City isn't bad either. At least you can sift through the s*** and pick positive and unbiased articles from various other websites.

Just for you Frank. Who the f*** are BBC Sport and Simon Stone?! Thank you to the person who posted the highlights on YouTube.

Click to expand...

You know you're allowed to swear on here, don't you?
 
The blue phantom said:
They want it now mate. Fuckin crave to be the headline.

How this shit festers in some folks heads is weird.

Day in day out searching how far up City are in the sports news & how big the column is.

Just enjoy how we play.
Click to expand...

Is there a spreadsheet you can download for this?!
 
This isn't swearing.

F***! :-)

It's 1 letter F and ***.

It could be any F word with 4 letters.

If people think it's a swear word, that's up to them. ;-)
 
SWP's back said:
Still not on Guardian but the later Classico had a full report.
Click to expand...

Just checked there is an article on it. Is that a full house now from those accused this morning?

Just out of interest if this morning the bbc/guardian/express were accused of bias because they did not have an article now they have one what does that prove?
 
franksinatra said:
Just checked there is an article on it. Is that a full house now from those accused this morning?

Just out of interest if this morning the bbc/guardian/express were accused of bias because they did not have an article now they have one what does that prove?
Click to expand...

I'm in another time zone +6 hours BST and was curious that the match reports appeared so late compared to every other ICC game that has been played.
Perhaps because it was Saturday night in Blighty and all the hacks were pissed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top