Media Thread 2017/18

Status
Not open for further replies.
Complaint submitted to the BBC regarding the blatant ignoring of the Lumpkaku incident.

"It appears that the MOTD editorial Team deliberately ignored an incident where Romelu Lukaku kicked out at a defender twice in the build up to Manchester United’s goal. It was clearly visible in real time, so there is no way it was missed by the analysts. I am certain there is more than the one camera angle of the incident, but it seems the team only chose to show a limited view of the incident.

Interestingly, the editorial team managed to find a camera of the slightest brush of the ball on the defenders foot as the ball went out for the corner which led to the goal, but strangely not the violent conduct in the same build up. Whilst this incident may not have directly affected the outcome, it was still violent conduct which is punishable by a Red Card. At the time of the incident this would have meant Manchester United would have to play for at least 24 minutes with 10 players, assuming the Match Officials saw the incident, which they obviously didn’t.

When Sergio Aguero elbowed Winston Reid, he was correctly retrospectively banned for violent conduct. The MOTD team carried out a full analysis of the incident, and it was played out on all social media platforms, including the BBC match report. Aguero was subsequently banned for the Manchester Derby. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37146992)

It makes me wonder what the BBC MOTD teams reasoning is behind not even mentioning the Lukaku incident 3 games before the Manchester Derby. It looks like a clear case of bias to me."

I expect the usual bulls**t reply.
 

Not seen this before. Absolutely awesome hairs standing up on the back of the neck stuff.
Remember going to the bog for a piss in the bar out here just after Dzeko's goal thinking too little too late, and as I came out, the noise was unbelievable. I looked at the screen and Aguero was running whirling his shirt above his head. Initially thought that it was a replay............. until it dawned on me that the chaos was due to the winning goal.
Unbef**kinlievable Jeff. Now off out (with a spring in my step) to watch us hopefully batter Huddersfield....................
 
Slight detour.
Social Media.
You can always rely on the Reg Cafe plastics to give you a laugh.
Then again, some of these respected(?) and highly paid Journalist's aren't much different.

Screenshot_20171126-112356.png


Screenshot_20171126-112416.png
 
Slight detour.
Social Media.
You can always rely on the Reg Cafe plastics to give you a laugh.
Then again, some of these respected(?) and highly paid Journalist's aren't much different.

Screenshot_20171126-112356.png


Screenshot_20171126-112416.png


It's finally dawning on the fcukers what they are up against. The last 2 City articles in the guardian must have attracted every human right activist who used to stand on the stretford end and the kop to leave a comment.
Fcukin hilarious.
 
Slight detour.
Social Media.
You can always rely on the Reg Cafe plastics to give you a laugh.
Then again, some of these respected(?) and highly paid Journalist's aren't much different.

Screenshot_20171126-112356.png


Screenshot_20171126-112416.png
Love that last one.Empty hey !! Bwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.If thats the only thing that they can jump one then we well and truly have the bastards rattled.
 
Complaint submitted to the BBC regarding the blatant ignoring of the Lumpkaku incident.

"It appears that the MOTD editorial Team deliberately ignored an incident where Romelu Lukaku kicked out at a defender twice in the build up to Manchester United’s goal. It was clearly visible in real time, so there is no way it was missed by the analysts. I am certain there is more than the one camera angle of the incident, but it seems the team only chose to show a limited view of the incident.

Interestingly, the editorial team managed to find a camera of the slightest brush of the ball on the defenders foot as the ball went out for the corner which led to the goal, but strangely not the violent conduct in the same build up. Whilst this incident may not have directly affected the outcome, it was still violent conduct which is punishable by a Red Card. At the time of the incident this would have meant Manchester United would have to play for at least 24 minutes with 10 players, assuming the Match Officials saw the incident, which they obviously didn’t.

When Sergio Aguero elbowed Winston Reid, he was correctly retrospectively banned for violent conduct. The MOTD team carried out a full analysis of the incident, and it was played out on all social media platforms, including the BBC match report. Aguero was subsequently banned for the Manchester Derby. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37146992)

It makes me wonder what the BBC MOTD teams reasoning is behind not even mentioning the Lukaku incident 3 games before the Manchester Derby. It looks like a clear case of bias to me."

I expect the usual bulls**t reply.
Complaint submitted to the BBC regarding the blatant ignoring of the Lumpkaku incident.

"It appears that the MOTD editorial Team deliberately ignored an incident where Romelu Lukaku kicked out at a defender twice in the build up to Manchester United’s goal. It was clearly visible in real time, so there is no way it was missed by the analysts. I am certain there is more than the one camera angle of the incident, but it seems the team only chose to show a limited view of the incident.

Interestingly, the editorial team managed to find a camera of the slightest brush of the ball on the defenders foot as the ball went out for the corner which led to the goal, but strangely not the violent conduct in the same build up. Whilst this incident may not have directly affected the outcome, it was still violent conduct which is punishable by a Red Card. At the time of the incident this would have meant Manchester United would have to play for at least 24 minutes with 10 players, assuming the Match Officials saw the incident, which they obviously didn’t.

When Sergio Aguero elbowed Winston Reid, he was correctly retrospectively banned for violent conduct. The MOTD team carried out a full analysis of the incident, and it was played out on all social media platforms, including the BBC match report. Aguero was subsequently banned for the Manchester Derby. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37146992)

It makes me wonder what the BBC MOTD teams reasoning is behind not even mentioning the Lukaku incident 3 games before the Manchester Derby. It looks like a clear case of bias to me."

I expect the usual bulls**t reply.
Buckaroo
Lukaku
 
Complaint submitted to the BBC regarding the blatant ignoring of the Lumpkaku incident.

"It appears that the MOTD editorial Team deliberately ignored an incident where Romelu Lukaku kicked out at a defender twice in the build up to Manchester United’s goal. It was clearly visible in real time, so there is no way it was missed by the analysts. I am certain there is more than the one camera angle of the incident, but it seems the team only chose to show a limited view of the incident.

Interestingly, the editorial team managed to find a camera of the slightest brush of the ball on the defenders foot as the ball went out for the corner which led to the goal, but strangely not the violent conduct in the same build up. Whilst this incident may not have directly affected the outcome, it was still violent conduct which is punishable by a Red Card. At the time of the incident this would have meant Manchester United would have to play for at least 24 minutes with 10 players, assuming the Match Officials saw the incident, which they obviously didn’t.

When Sergio Aguero elbowed Winston Reid, he was correctly retrospectively banned for violent conduct. The MOTD team carried out a full analysis of the incident, and it was played out on all social media platforms, including the BBC match report. Aguero was subsequently banned for the Manchester Derby. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37146992)

It makes me wonder what the BBC MOTD teams reasoning is behind not even mentioning the Lukaku incident 3 games before the Manchester Derby. It looks like a clear case of bias to me."

I expect the usual bulls**t reply.


Very well written mate. But we all know that there are different rules for that club. If that was a player for any other team in the country, retrospective action would be taken.
 
Complaint submitted to the BBC regarding the blatant ignoring of the Lumpkaku incident.

"It appears that the MOTD editorial Team deliberately ignored an incident where Romelu Lukaku kicked out at a defender twice in the build up to Manchester United’s goal. It was clearly visible in real time, so there is no way it was missed by the analysts. I am certain there is more than the one camera angle of the incident, but it seems the team only chose to show a limited view of the incident.

Interestingly, the editorial team managed to find a camera of the slightest brush of the ball on the defenders foot as the ball went out for the corner which led to the goal, but strangely not the violent conduct in the same build up. Whilst this incident may not have directly affected the outcome, it was still violent conduct which is punishable by a Red Card. At the time of the incident this would have meant Manchester United would have to play for at least 24 minutes with 10 players, assuming the Match Officials saw the incident, which they obviously didn’t.

When Sergio Aguero elbowed Winston Reid, he was correctly retrospectively banned for violent conduct. The MOTD team carried out a full analysis of the incident, and it was played out on all social media platforms, including the BBC match report. Aguero was subsequently banned for the Manchester Derby. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37146992)

It makes me wonder what the BBC MOTD teams reasoning is behind not even mentioning the Lukaku incident 3 games before the Manchester Derby. It looks like a clear case of bias to me."

I expect the usual bulls**t reply.

Good post that mate. Worth challenging the BBC on this one even if it only highlights the issue.

The problem is the fact we know retrospective punishment is genuinely determined by trial by media and so this is really a FA issue but pressuring the BBC as a byproduct is not a bad thing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.