He needs to stick to washing socks. Its refreshing to hear Sergio speak highly of bobby in his book.Yeah, I’d still take Mancini over the gobby kit man every day of the week.
Even if Mancini was a **** in the end and various players didn’t like him for it I still don’t give a fuck. We wouldn’t be where we are now without the foundations he laid.He needs to stick to washing socks. Its refreshing to hear Sergio speak highly of bobby in his book.
2 sides to every story and both deserve the right to be heard,only one is boosting his pension talking about it and showing he can't let things from 4 yrs ago go
No one is asking you to think any different. But I’m not sure why people are still so precious about it. I love what he did for City but I can accept he must have been a bit of a **** to work under/with.Even if Mancini was a **** in the end and various players didn’t like him for it I still don’t give a fuck. We wouldn’t be where we are now without the foundations he laid.
Right man, right time and he’ll always be held in the highest regard by me.
Because he keeps repeating the same things 4 years on,he can say no more questions about mancini anytime he wants,he doesn't because it's kerching to him,i remember shears going off the deep end when bobby did a short interview after he left,he said he should keep his gob shut or words to that effect,he could respond everytime chappie talks about him as he would have a right to but he is a grown up who has moved alongHe’s talking about Mancini falling out with the players. It’s true, they did fall out. It’s why Mancini was ultimately sacked. When several players that formed the spine went to Khaldoon and said ‘it’s him or us’.
Chapman is being interviewed and asked questions, I’m not sure why his answers upset anyone.
I couldn't get past the clumsy grammar and poor punctuation of the first paragraph.
Well tbf if Chappy is making comments (in an interview, granted) then it’s only right that blues should make their views known on the content of said comments.No one is asking you to think any different. But I’m not sure why people are still so precious about it. I love what he did for City but I can accept he must have been a bit of a **** to work under/with.
What’s he going to say? “I didn’t lose the dressing room”? He won’t as he did.Because he keeps repeating the same things 4 years on,he can say no more questions about mancini anytime he wants,he doesn't because it's kerching to him,i remember shears going off the deep end when bobby did a short interview after he left,he said he should keep his gob shut or words to that effect,he could respond everytime chappie talks about him as he would have a right to but he is a grown up who has moved along
Thin skinned no,he was a **** we all know that,just move on 4 yrs later,it seems to be all chappy has to get attentionWhat’s he going to say? “I didn’t lose the dressing room”? He won’t as he did.
No idea why you’re so thin skinned over it.
He’s talking about Mancini falling out with the players. It’s true, they did fall out. It’s why Mancini was ultimately sacked. When several players that formed the spine went to Khaldoon and said ‘it’s him or us’.
Chapman is being interviewed and asked questions, I’m not sure why his answers upset anyone.
2 sides to every story and both deserve the right to be heard,only one is boosting his pension talking about it and showing he can't let things from 4 yrs ago go
That’s bollocks. chappie is 69 for a start and still employed by the club.Bobby is still working where as Chappy is doing interviews for the Daily Mail on the only thing anyone is slightly interested in.
I will always view Moyes as being more successful than Ferguson!That’s bollocks. chappie is 69 for a start and still employed by the club.
By that logic, Moyes is more successful than Ferguson as Moyes is still employed.
I mentioned the Tevez thing earlier mate. Chappie has really put the knife into Bobby regarding that incident. Not one fuckin ounce of blame has Chappie directed at Tevez. He's one bitter twat.Fair play to Chappy he has made a decent career out of being the class clown and behaving like an adolescent to entertain a load of footballers and at times thats exactly what is required.
But its clear as day in his comments on Tevez why he stayed a kit man and never managed at the top level like Bobby. Clearly Tevez questioned and then refused to follow the managers instructions and pretty much any industry thats not accepted and would certainly not be accepted by any manager worth there salt like Pep, Conte etc. Chappy clearly does not understand that or that a snort of tabasco sauce up the nose just will not cut it.
Its clear he did fall out with players including Kompany which resulted from the club versus country row and sadly 4 years on that is still playing out at the club now and has resulted in similar arguments with Pellers etc.
Based on Kompanys continual injuries its difficult to argue he did not have a point.
I have no doubt in 5 years Yaya will not speak too highly of Pep but it will not effect my judgement of him as a manager, as like any other he will be judged on results alone.
3 years under Mancini produced our first trophy in 35 years, first ever qualification to Champs lge, first title in 44 years and in his worse season a cup final and 2nd place finish but no handshake for Chappy.