Media Thread 2017/18

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
squirtyflower said:
Should be able to opt out paying the licence tax.
Click to expand...
Haven't paid it in years over here, it's something like €170 for 2 tv channels and a couple of radio stations, all of which are riddled with ads. Plus, the ****s won't even support our domestic league by televising games. If they want to show ads they should subsist on that income. Stepmother works for the post office and she warns me when the licence inspector is about, I just close the front gate and leave the dogs in the front garden. They don't like strangers.
 
aguero93:20 said:
Haven't paid it in years over here, it's something like €170 for 2 tv channels and a couple of radio stations, all of which are riddled with ads. Plus, the ****s won't even support our domestic league by televising games. If they want to show ads they should subsist on that income. Stepmother works for the post office and she warns me when the licence inspector is about, I just close the front gate and leave the dogs in the front garden. They don't like strangers.
Click to expand...
I’m moving soon, may do it then
 
another slant from our game v dortmund and the dippers v dortmund

bbc headline in the dippers report is defeated bur depleted , but ours its in the small print before it mentions all 16 world cup players not available

i know its just a small thing but its symptomatic of how we differ from the darlings
 
tonea2003 said:
another slant from our game v dortmund and the dippers v dortmund

bbc headline in the dippers report is defeated bur depleted , but ours its in the small print before it mentions all 16 world cup players not available

i know its just a small thing but its symptomatic of how we differ from the darlings
Click to expand...
Thought exactly the same thing.
 
tonea2003 said:
another slant from our game v dortmund and the dippers v dortmund

bbc headline in the dippers report is defeated bur depleted , but ours its in the small print before it mentions all 16 world cup players not available

i know its just a small thing but its symptomatic of how we differ from the darlings
Click to expand...
What I took away from the bbc reports and the positioning of stories/headlines is that during the liverpool game, United stars unlucky not to have gone to the WC were playing a bit after the Liverpool game in front of a expectant crowd against a good team with the prospect of the future stars showing their skills and scoring goals.

But after the match , they didn’t seem to have played at all, as the match report was far down the list of headlines - and only on the football page.

Presumably a boring, 1 shot on target, pitiful crowd, same old tactics against a team far worse than Stoke (12 points in 19, in a league far away from PL level), captain injured, new signing missing start of season, a few weeks before the start of the season wasn’t worth pushing further up the news agenda.

Still it allowed them to concentrate on ‘did city make a mistake selling sancho’ and ‘Joe Hart is still a good keeper’ type top stories...

Or maybe it’s just me
 
Can't remember where but actually saw an article asking klopp about his massive spending.

He answered how the world has changed and He has changed his opinion as he need to make Liverpool win.

Adding to the pressure himself
 
'Pep meets the Yankees'

http://www.skysports.com/share/11446114
It's supposed to say what it says on the tin but about two paragraphs down it says "after a shaky start pep will be looking for a reaction..." regarding the defeat against Dortmund.
Who the fuck writes this shite?
Compare it to Liverpool's post match report and a lot stronger 11 put out than ours and these tossers at sky word it that a depleted Liverpool got defeated.
What the actual fuck?
Going to be a long long season of utter drivvle and biased opinions when it's supposed to be equal and balanced across the board.
Twats.
 
manimanc said:
So he's indirectly saying he isn't good enough without spending money?
I'll go with that.
Click to expand...
Well, it was commonly implied that pep was just a ‘cheque-book’ manager who spent lots of money to buy success everywhere he went.
I’ll not hold my breath waiting for similar comments about the sacred jeeeeaaaargen
 
manimanc said:
'Pep meets the Yankees'

http://www.skysports.com/share/11446114
It's supposed to say what it says on the tin but about two paragraphs down it says "after a shaky start pep will be looking for a reaction..." regarding the defeat against Dortmund.
Who the fuck writes this shite?
Compare it to Liverpool's post match report and a lot stronger 11 put out than ours and these tossers at sky word it that a depleted Liverpool got defeated.
What the actual fuck?
Going to be a long long season of utter drivvle and biased opinions when it's supposed to be equal and balanced across the board.
Twats.
Click to expand...

Unless you you have a city fan writing it will always have bitterness in it some where rags scousers spurs and Arsenal supporters all work there what you expect an apologetic write up like Liverpool got and the scum?
 
waspish said:
Unless you you have a city fan writing it will always have bitterness in it some where rags scousers spurs and Arsenal supporters all work there what you expect an apologetic write up like Liverpool got and the scum?
Click to expand...
I know mate, I should just drop em out and ignore it but it gets on my nerves how in your face it is and how much they don't even try to hide it. Wankers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top