Prattling on about how a striker would rather lose and score rather than win and not score-didn’t watch Bamford today thenYes agree , Tyler is a 75 year old dinosaur, mute him every match.
Prattling on about how a striker would rather lose and score rather than win and not score-didn’t watch Bamford today thenYes agree , Tyler is a 75 year old dinosaur, mute him every match.
You missed the BBC's simpering intern announcing that news. The abuse was a side issue as she praised him highly for a response 'that was typical of him.'St Marcus receiving racist abuse made the national headlines. GMP involved so I wonder how rigorous the investigation will be.
If he has been racially abused the culprits need to be dealt with. However it stinks of convenience that this and the similar stories last week were raised as nited were struggling. Classic news management that has the stench of Ashton all over it.
Protective. That's funny.
No, what I am is able to separate rivalry with reality. The fact some label him as St Marcus, because of what he does out of football, shows they can't. So no, not protective.
I’m not sure how anybody could have a go at Rashford, let’s hope that charges are brought soon.I like and admire Rashford and I’m disgusted by the racism. He’s a fine young man and a million times better than the low life who have had a go at him.
Nah they'll probably run a story that we've failed ffp.Not one mention. We had just a really shit match write up , no puff pieces, nothing. Instantly the rags and dippers have follow up pieces, player ratings, what shampoo they use etc. their new lover boy is Tuchel with four or five instant pieces and even Leeds get two. If City continue to play this new exiting style of football and go on to win the league whilst still being ignored surely the press and media will be publicly called out on it?