Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blue_eyes said:
Fcking bbc(who else)footy page, keeping up the hate in the absence of games(and probably deflecting from their red babies thrashings too), with the article headed, SORIANO DEFENDS MAN CITY SPENDING, The headline alone is enough to have our detractors drawing their swords in readyness, and the first paragraph of the "article" does not dissapoint,including the line, Soriano has defended the clubs decision to "SPEND OVER £120 MILLION ON NEW PLAYERS AT A TIME WHEN MANY LOWER-LEAGUE COUNTERPARTS ARE FACING A BLEAK FINANCIAL FUTURE DUE TO CORONAVIRUS"....fcking hell we are a horrible club. It aslo contains that sourpuss quote "DIAS FEE WOULD RUN LEAGUE TWO FOR A SEASON", christ!!! those with drawn swords should now be banging at he doors of the Etihad.It does mention net spend but includes no figures, just Soriano stating that we sold Sane for £49m and bought Torres for "£23m", hmmph, Sorianos words so bound to be less than the £30+m reported everywhere else, inc bbcs own unbiased "journalists". Now, for those who serously believe we are not singled out by the likes of the bbc,sky etc as examples of whats bad about football...... Why choose City AGAIN for this type of article when chelsea have spent a LOT more, and why not mention net spend figures in an article about spending, could it be that man u have a BIGGER net spend??, bloody hell!!, even ASTON VILLA, EVERTON AND LEEDS have a bigger net spend this summer. Even the most ardent deniers of media bias have to ask questions, it is relentless, and we are now the "go to" team to quote in articles concerning footballing negatives. It is like one of those medical conditions that creeps up on you over the years, slowly but surely undermining your health without you realising until its too late, and now that disease is fully manifested in 99% of media output tripe. Our owners are fantastic, and have done loads for the community etc,as well as making a success of City in the face of ongoing adversity. If you dont put this down to racism fuelled hatred, then one can only assume its because we have trodden on the toes of the medias "chosen" clubs and that a large majority of the footballing press are biased,arrogant ,jealous, lying twats......its as simple as that.
Click to expand...
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
It's a twisted and distorted article trying to link Sorriano's general comments to earlier ones made by Carol Shanahan, Port Vale chief. It was produced by Simon Stone who has a track record of doing this sort of article. Sorriano was doing a Q and A which was nothing to do with the Shanahan story which came out last week.
Click to expand...
Exactly, find something involving us, and present it with a negative headline and in a negative light hoping to incite hate from the sheeple....twats.
 
Blue_eyes said:
Exactly, find something involving us, and present it with a negative headline and in a negative light hoping to incite hate from the sheeple....twats.
Click to expand...
Compare the MEN coverage, which is a straight factual report within the context that Sorriano was on an online forum, with the BBC report that has been twisted and linked to an unrelated story from last week. There is something seriously wrong at BBC Online sport.
 
Blue_eyes said:
I can write properly when I need to thank you, you might be better commenting on the subject matter.........unless its presentation means more to you.
Click to expand...
Your post is almost unreadable due to that wall of text so you can 'comment on the subject at hand' all you want but a lot of people will just skip over it.

Guess you just can't help some people.
 
Centurions said:
Your post is almost unreadable due to that wall of text so you can 'comment on the subject at hand' all you want but a lot of people will just skip over it.

Guess you just can't help some people.
Click to expand...
i actually skipped it, it looked to frightening ,it was if the post was shouting at me without taking a breath :)
 
Blue_eyes said:
Fcking bbc(who else)footy page, keeping up the hate in the absence of games(and probably deflecting from their red babies thrashings too), with the article headed, SORIANO DEFENDS MAN CITY SPENDING, The headline alone is enough to have our detractors drawing their swords in readyness, and the first paragraph of the "article" does not dissapoint,including the line, Soriano has defended the clubs decision to "SPEND OVER £120 MILLION ON NEW PLAYERS AT A TIME WHEN MANY LOWER-LEAGUE COUNTERPARTS ARE FACING A BLEAK FINANCIAL FUTURE DUE TO CORONAVIRUS"....fcking hell we are a horrible club. It aslo contains that sourpuss quote "DIAS FEE WOULD RUN LEAGUE TWO FOR A SEASON", christ!!! those with drawn swords should now be banging at he doors of the Etihad.It does mention net spend but includes no figures, just Soriano stating that we sold Sane for £49m and bought Torres for "£23m", hmmph, Sorianos words so bound to be less than the £30+m reported everywhere else, inc bbcs own unbiased "journalists". Now, for those who serously believe we are not singled out by the likes of the bbc,sky etc as examples of whats bad about football...... Why choose City AGAIN for this type of article when chelsea have spent a LOT more, and why not mention net spend figures in an article about spending, could it be that man u have a BIGGER net spend??, bloody hell!!, even ASTON VILLA, EVERTON AND LEEDS have a bigger net spend this summer. Even the most ardent deniers of media bias have to ask questions, it is relentless, and we are now the "go to" team to quote in articles concerning footballing negatives. It is like one of those medical conditions that creeps up on you over the years, slowly but surely undermining your health without you realising until its too late, and now that disease is fully manifested in 99% of media output tripe. Our owners are fantastic, and have done loads for the community etc,as well as making a success of City in the face of ongoing adversity. If you dont put this down to racism fuelled hatred, then one can only assume its because we have trodden on the toes of the medias "chosen" clubs and that a large majority of the footballing press are biased,arrogant ,jealous, lying twats......its as simple as that.
Click to expand...
Like Asthma?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.