asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 8,833
The whole spending debate and City is an old story rehashed. We are compliant as far as FFP is concerned so what the club does with its finances is of no one's business.
City does not get to field 12 players in each game so I really don't get this squad cost nonsense. Kepa and Alisson cost more than double the transfer fee of Ederson who has been head and shoulders above both.
If all clubs invested well at infrastructure at the youth level if the football pyramid was better managed, you would have a lot more flow of talent and hence the transfer inflation will come down. The current structures in all leagues are that there is too talent available only for one or two teams. That's due to a lack of investment flowing at the grassroots level. The issue is systemic and has very little to do with City.
Championship and League 1 are in the top 10 leagues in Europe in terms of fans in the stadium, how has that not translated into commercial revenues? That's because they are poorly positioned/managed commercially. I think EFL is being mismanaged badly (and if I put my tinfoil hat on mismanaged intentionally) and piss poor journalism has been a great enabler in the process.
The club does not get any outside credit for its structure, recruitment or investment strategy. The £200 million income from academy products hardly gets a mention. The long term planning is unique among football clubs.
I know our foes are worried hence the money reaction, I just wish some of our own gave more credit to all aspects of the club rather than criticise minuscule issues.