stonerblue
Well-Known Member
That's the internet for you..I'm not really bothered about "a good look".
He told a lie, and has admitted he did. Why do that?
That's the internet for you..I'm not really bothered about "a good look".
He told a lie, and has admitted he did. Why do that?
FFS.Just looked up the muen. Decent article on why it was a penalty by Brennan.
Bajkowsty's match ratings are from a parallel universe! Best players Foden and KdB get 8 each! Clear and systematic!
Guess there's a reason the muen isn't saved to my homepage and why they have to give it away free!
17What rating did they give Bellingham for reference ?
Now I know why I never go on there for anything....I dropped football with them quite so time ago, my phone became a handheld advert trying to get into that link.
Please ignore the wums and keep up the good work. Always a good read your articles.I'm not really bothered about "a good look".
He told a lie, and has admitted he did. Why do that?
Or 1/10 after Gundo gave him a shove whilst 'having a word'.About right then. :)
I wouldn’t say controversial but they were a bit raggy/dippery, we are not that sort of club. Pep prefers the humble confident type of player and so do I.Ok I guess, what with the media at it is now, making stories out of social media posts, but Foden’s posts weren’t really controversial (were they?)
Bang on the money, Wilson and the Guardian have a clear anti City bias. Shocking paper and another click bait articleGuess who is writing about the SPortswashing Derby?
Predictable. What annoys me more are the City fans who spend hours fighting our corner on there. Don't. The Guardian do it to appeal to annoyed Liverpool and Man Utd fans. It's so transparent. All you do is provide a focus for argument and give them the interest and discussion they want. Just don't comment.
I'm not saying journalists are slow but where has he been hiding to only just notice this, lol?