stuart brennan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 223
I'm not really bothered about "a good look".
He told a lie, and has admitted he did. Why do that?
He told a lie, and has admitted he did. Why do that?
There's never anyone there - that would imply they were looking for work!!!Yea but the 'police' ( lol ) police ! Could have taken the photos down the the local job centre to identify them
But, but, but that's NOT the narrative.How are they still so clueless about their own history? Surely it’s been pointed out to them numerous times over the years? How thick and deluded are they?
Without a sugar Daddy, Newton Heath would have gone bust in the early 1900s and there would be no Manchester United and no Old Trafford. Without a sugar Daddy, United would have gone bust in the 1930s and there would be no Manchester United. Without a sugar Daddy, United wouldn’t have been able to build the most expensive football team ever assembled at the time in the late-80s/early-90s despite going a quarter of a century without winning the league (or much at all) and their greatest era would never have happened.
All football clubs who’ve had success start out with a sugar Daddy pumping money into them to kick start a period of success. Every one. It’s happened to everyone with success ever in the history and the future of the sport. Every one. Without exception.
I’d say 8/10 was about right tbh, would you give them 10’s ?Just looked up the muen. Decent article on why it was a penalty by Brennan.
Bajkowsty's match ratings are from a parallel universe! Best players Foden and KdB get 8 each! Clear and systematic!
Guess there's a reason the muen isn't saved to my homepage and why they have to give it away free!
I’d say they were at least a 9 (fwiw!)I’d say 8/10 was about right tbh, would you give them 10’s ?
Phil hardly had a kick first half and this is a media outlet not a supporter we’re talking about, not saying they don’t print some crap but this isn’t something I’d lose sleep over.I’d say they were at least a 9 (fwiw!)
Ok I guess, what with the media at it is now, making stories out of social media posts, but Foden’s posts weren’t really controversial (were they?)i see Phil Foden's posts to Mbappe are in the media
Likewise mate, hence my “fwiw!” - ie it’s not worth very much.Phil hardly had a kick first half and this is a media outlet not a supporter we’re talking about, not saying they don’t print some crap but this isn’t something I’d lose sleep over.