burning blue soul
Well-Known Member
I'd never seen this before. Good watch on the greatest sporting moment.
Goosebumps, everytime!!!
I'd never seen this before. Good watch on the greatest sporting moment.
The problem with Cohen’s article is not that he raises issues relating to human rights abuses in Abu Dhabi but that he it’s in the context of Manchester City.
Investment from the UAE is prevalent in vast swathes of the western economy but, seemingly, it’s football where it goes beyond the pale. If City are supposedly contaminated by the policies of the Government of which are owner is part, then so is virtually every aspect of our society from the financial institutions on which we rely to infrastructure we use and the fuel we put in our cars. And then what’s the consequence? It’s implied in every article like this that City’s fans should rise up in an act of ethical resistance but seemingly the same isn’t expected amongst anyone else benefiting from UAE investment (or Chinese, Brazilian, Thai, etc) in the west.
Ultimately are we supposed to cut ourselves off from all nations that commit human rights abuses? Or are we supposed to hypocritically salve our consciousness by standing up to City whilst ignoring the egregious abuses that underpin the daily functioning of modern lives.
The second failure of Cohen’s article is the failure to understand that high profile investments from Abu Dhabi work in both directions. There’s a desire on their part to normalise Arab states as part of the furniture of the western world but it also exists to show conservatives that the UAE can invest and prosper in freer and more liberal cultures.
Nonetheless, the response on here to Cohen’s piece is typically depressing - he’s a **** etc. That’s playing the man and not the ball and we need more effective rebuttals. There may be blues who don’t care about torture and imprisonment without trial but I’m not one of them.
Exactly as @bobbyowenquiff, there are quite a few human rights activists making a very nice living out of Manchester City who couldn’t give a flying fùck about actual real human rights abuses such as MacKenna and McGeehan, even Amnesty UK have used Man City as a way of gathering publicity to their associated causes.Agree with most of your post but not the last paragraph. I am pretty sure that Nick Cohen (a strong supporter of US policy in the Middle East) doesn't care a jot about torture and imprisonment without trial. What he cares about is getting a nice fat cheque from the Observer for producing some re-hashed garbage. There's a big band of freelances making a nice living out of the human rights industry. They are despicable.
When they mention ‘Slave Labour’, ‘Atrocious Conditions’ and ‘Illegal Detainment’ do they not also refer to our fellow Europeans who come to this country to pick the harvest, living in sheds and caravans and earning less than minimal wage? What about our consent to allow detainees to be transferred to Guantanamo or the legitimate refugees forced to live in disgraceful conditions, during a pandemic, conditions that our very own soldiers were forced to endure not too long ago.
Selective reporting confirms that it is ‘Organised and clear’.
His premise is seriosuly flawed, how can anybody take it seriously when he originally mentions that he is a United fan who loves City‘s football. No true fan would admit to that thus setting a false base. Following that I’d expect to read about other clubs owners/sponsors, not only about City. If you are going to omit Saudi Telecom on behalf of United, Rwanada on behalf of Arsenal and Standard Chartered on behalf of Liverpool, to name but a few, then the premise of bringing this up as a debate has not been made.There is much to commend this post but we shouldn't go there, this is the land of whataboutism and moral equivalence and if we play this game we accept Cohen's terms of reference.
Cohen's aim is not to win the argument on face value, that's why he does such a piss poor job in preparing his case, this is just a rambling polemic he reheated from a few years back designed with one purpose and one purpose only and that is to get people to accept its premise, because if they do he wins.
Funnily enough modern batteries fuelling everything from phones to laptops to electric cars rely largely on cobalt mined by children in Congo for their Chinese overlords.A few? I've got 670m in my database - all Rags. And then there's the Dipper Diaspora upon which I would love to test a hickory baseball bat. Do they make baseball bats out of hickory? Sounds as though they should.
Aah, Wiki tells me it's ash, but some can be made from maple, hickory or bamboo. Is there anything that can't be made from bamboo. It's gonne be the saviour of the planet. Wonder if yer can make an electric battery from bamboo that has a range of 500 miles.
95% of Chinese citizens are very happy with their lives and the leadership. That's because their leadership has brought them prosperity and financial security, creating a well-off and entrepreneurial middle-class. In return, they ask that these people don't rock the boat, which they're happy to agree to.
Exactly. This is the crux of it. And since we won't/don't, it's further implied that Manchester City fans are therefore morally flawed or at least conflicted, and "the rest of us" (non-City fans) aren't, which makes "the rest of us" morally superior and therefore better humans inherently. Which then renders City's football success doubly irrelevant.It’s implied in every article like this that City’s fans should rise up in an act of ethical resistance but seemingly the same isn’t expected amongst anyone else benefiting from UAE investment (or Chinese, Brazilian, Thai, etc) in the west.