bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
This is par for the course for Stone. His stories are littered with errors.You didn't even flag up this?
Former instead of form, poor stuff for a journalist I'd say.
This is par for the course for Stone. His stories are littered with errors.You didn't even flag up this?
Former instead of form, poor stuff for a journalist I'd say.
I thought Messi was coming on a free. In marketing terms he would be a huge cash cow for CFG. We can hugely increase the size of our sponsor deals. City would make a major commercial profit on Messi. If he ends up at New York City FC we will make another boatload of cash. Darren Lewis is a total moron. It's stunning how dense some of these tabloid hacks are. The only risk with Messi is possible disruption to the team but that's a risk worth taking in my view.Darren Lewis on Talksport. He is a turd.
"Messi is past it totally, but if he came and Pep won the CL, then it would be only because Messi came and totally devalue it."
"In these times it would be grotesque to spend a billion on a player."
When asked if it would be the same if United sign Sancho for 100 million, he said " no because it would be different"
Oh dear real embarrassing stuff, to be fair the other presenters were pulling him up.
Speed reading, I saw "Catalan" and Txiki" and went for the jugular. ;-)You didn't even flag up this?
Former instead of form, poor stuff for a journalist I'd say.
?"Should of". Back to school Grealish you illiterate twat.
Darren Lewis is full of shit, a typical Victimpool "fan".Darren Lewis on Talksport. He is a turd.
"Messi is past it totally, but if he came and Pep won the CL, then it would be only because Messi came and totally devalue it."
"In these times it would be grotesque to spend a billion on a player."
When asked if it would be the same if United sign Sancho for 100 million, he said " no because it would be different"
Oh dear real embarrassing stuff, to be fair the other presenters were pulling him up.
I think your are mistaken my friend. Should Have or should've is correct."Should of". Back to school Grealish you illiterate twat.
But should of is not.I think your are mistaken my friend. Should Have or should've is correct.