Pablo ZZZ Peroni
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,489
Yes this:)Yes, you are spot on; sometimes it’s outright, and sometimes subtle or ‘clever’.
I listened to the Monday night 5 live show a couple of weeks ago, and for 1 hour 55 mins it would be difficult to not see his point on a whole range of footy issues they discussed; I didn’t always agree with him, but no drama, sensible stuff.
However with 5 mins left, in the middle of a sentence about something else, he drops in that we are state owned, and continues on without pausing, as if it’s a given, an uncontested, uncontroversial point of fact, and means one of other panellists or host has to derail the conversation if they want to challenge it - with 5 mins left… That’s the sort of sly stuff that he does.
I’d still have liked the host or one of the others to pick him up on it, but they didn’t. On that occasion he tried his best to allow no time for it, but the presenter should still have picked him up on it.
I linked a NYT transcript recently of an interview he had to be v careful he was factually correct. Surprise, surprise he described the legal ownership correctly but still managed a negative connotation,
It's like the repeated "we got off on a technicality" garbage they spout and the likes of Panja and him know this isn't the truth