Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jack Pitt-Brooke, who was a City blogger before he became a journo, recently wrote that City don't want Kane enough because they're not just handing over a £160m straight fee. His evidence for this is that City were willing to spend £65m on a third choice centre back.

He meant Ruben Dias.
Never heard of him.

Isn't it sad how people lose their principles for a little bit of money or a little bit of fame? Once your principles have gone, all that's left is greed and lies.
 
Anyone hear any criticism of Chelsea, highest spenders last summer with around £230m splashed and just followed City in spending £100m on a player (give or take a few quid)
No? Me either.

Conclusion - City are seen as more of a threat, and also Pep is a factor. Football fans can't help but knock him
All I heard last season was “Chelsea mean business!”
 
Corruptible as in 'everyone has a price' or do they have any actual evidence that they are?
.CAS have a solid rep of being straight. Suspect the Grauniad forgot it was CAS who cleared us and, incidently, made a strong statement that we were cleared on substantive grounds, i.e. if the two cases in question had been litigated, we would have been cleared.
 
Does idealistic imply honesty?
Getting very philosophical (semantics) there. I would say true idealism does imply honesty and lack of integrity shows your idealism to be false and self serving. I am sure Bertrand Russell would agree with me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.