A great article in the Independent an honest review I would say. long but week worth a read
It is widely believed that delooney writes for a small online publication because no serious outlet will give him a job.That's a great game actually ....
Some people say Delaney is a screaming bender with no more right to live on God's green Earth than a weasel.
There is a feeling that he must be getting paid to continually criticise City because there can be no other reason for such unashamed bullshittery.
Etc etc ...
It's never been any different since the inception of the Football League in 1888.A great article in the Independent an honest review I would say. long but week worth a read
Yes, quite bizarre. He's actually a Liverpool fan... did you not get the "Klopp is a god" feeling about it!Bizarre article even by Delooney's standards. Whilst couched in faint praise, it amounts to "how dare a club seek to achieve excellence, it's not fair". I like all the "some people say.." and "there's a feeling that..." all of which betrays the simple fact that, as a united fan, he's hurting. Long may it continue. Keep 'em coming Miguel, we love it.
Except he says, again, multiple times, Manchester City are owned by Abu Dhabi the state, which is categorically not the case. Delaney is full of shit and and absolute bitter rag wanker.A great article in the Independent an honest review I would say. long but week worth a read
The difference is that Abu Dhabi's sorcerers put a spell on anyone brazen enough to beat us. Black Magic Club.It's never been any different since the inception of the Football League in 1888.
You play each other team in said league twice (home and away)and the team with the most number of points at the end,are crowned as Champions.
Simples!!!!
Twatting them would be fun though.Because they turn up. Watch city win 95% of the time. Get pissed off and head to twitter to say how its not fair
Banning them would actually be doing them good. Makes no impact to us, they’ll write what they want irrespective of being there or not
It is the usual despicable piece you would expect from the author. It is riddled with mistakes. He describes Khaldoon as the "de facto Prime Minister of UAE" and City as a a "state project." He says the club was bought for "the glory of Abu Dhabi" and for "political aims." He also claims we have "limitless funds" and escaped from Covid unscathed (ignoring our £126m loss last season).A great article in the Independent an honest review I would say. long but week worth a read