bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
This is true. Those who say that relentless negative media campaigns against City and our owner have no impact on our reputation and our business are wrong. For example I believe the last New York City stadium deal was undermined by local anti-arab human rights campaigners. They have a strong lobby in New York City. That remains an issue for CFG.Of course it does. Media pours millions into attacking MCFC. Its reverse marketing. The business world has been doing it for decades and some people think it doesn't work? There is now a perception of MCFC but the flipside to this is that most City fans like being the rebel. City grew when we went to Division Two.
The more water they throw on our fire, the faster we build it but to argue that either method doesn't have an effect is stupid. We have a media thread because pumping huge volumes of negative publicity out there has consequence
The latest phrase creeping into press conferences and the media (Klopp and Ole have both used it recently) is "We (LFC and MUFC) are a self-sustaining club." That is a line fed in by the Comms team at LFC and MUFC and is designed to damage City as much as possible. It is more nuanced than the "oil money" narrative which doesn't stack up in any case. That phrase has not appeared out of nowhere.
That said we have achieved success in spite of the smear campaigns and will continue to do so if we hold our nerve.