Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is, but the story comes from The Athletic with the MP criticising being Chris Bryant, the very same Chris Bryant who tweeted the following to a Russian Oligarch father and son:

View attachment 38973

So not the government then. Not even anyone with any responsibility for the Middle East.

Help me, Rhondda (yes, I know).

Although they have to be seen to be critical of any overtures to Syria, I very much doubt the government or foreign office will be personally criticising Mansour. Not a great headline by the BBC, unless I am wrong.

This is wrong, the government did comment for The Atletic's article.

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) responded to the move by saying: "It is the UK's firm belief that - in the absence of a change in behaviour by the Syrian regime - strengthening ties undermines the prospect of a lasting and inclusive peace in Syria."
 
Not gone down well with many a football journalist:


At last someone spells it out. Anything fan-led is driven by tribalism not logic. Such as the "consultation" was, the outcome, as in so many of these types of enquiry was pre-determined based on the media-driven zeitgeist. And we all know what that is really about.
 
Aren’t they missing the main point - in that the most significant meeting Assad had was with the ruler of Dubai? I’d like some comment from the FA on that given that Emirates is the title sponsor, oh and what have Arsenal got to say on the subject?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.