I think you are one of the few on here who regularly give articulate reasoned mature responses, often with details to support your views. Hardly a militant crank.
Pot discovered to be kettle, for the umpteenth time.
Related parties are irrelevant according to United, odd how City’s ‘related parties’ aren’t irrelevant when it comes to something non-lethal like football.
Well let’s hope they blow a load of smoke up Chelskie and Roman the doll salesman’s arse then.I was watching that and thought, what the fuck!
Not only were they reporting ”LIVE” from Wembley this morning, but will be doing so throughout the day, and all the way through to the final.
Nice to see this Cup getting the recognition it deserves!
They’ve terminated the deal according to the bbcGood to know that hypocrisy is still firmly entrenched in the rags DNA
I’m sure Liverpool and FSG, will have their very own all American Rocky Balboa, to overcome the nasty horrible Ivan Drago (Roman Abramovich) and Chelski.Well let’s hope they blow a load of smoke up Chelskie and Roman the doll salesman’s arse then.
Given current events you might have imagined Sly would keep a low profile on this final.
Maybe it will be presented as dippers vs a physical manifestation of the Russian threat to the world.
Recent dipper signings Will Smith and Bruce Willis are the front two for the red saviours.
You're right. Odd given they have no view on geo political issues. Not odd given listing on US stock exchangeThey’ve terminated the deal according to the bbc
You're right. Odd given they have no view on geo political issues. Not odd given listing on US stock exchange
How dare u call me a cynic!!Cynic.
I thought the Glazers were Trump supporters. Shouldn't they be cheering Vlad on?
HAhahaFfs from the muen…..can’t bring myself to post the link.
Why Manchester United should be one of England's most loved clubs for all fans
I think Sam Lee's initial tweet was worded a bit clumsily but it's been blown a little out of proportion imo. Surprised that the argument is seemingly still continuing on Twitter, given everything that's happened in the last 48 hours, but there we go. The internet is serious business, after all, but it all seemed a bit unnecessary and unedifying.
Can see why some felt it was a loaded question and are a bit wary, especially after Nick Harris' recent sham questionnaire, but Lee is hardly in the category as Harris. Not entirely sure what the purpose of his article is though, given that the middle ground he mentions probably represents the vast majority of City fans (certainly those that I know, at least). I doubt we'll be getting any unique insight into how most of us already think, but I'll reserve judgement until the article is published.
For what it's worth, I don't care about his background as a United fan. I don't really want a City cheerleader like a James Pearce or Simon Hughes. Just someone who writes intelligently and fairly about my club.
Do you think the vast majority of the media give us fair & balanced treatment Ric?I think Sam Lee's initial tweet was worded a bit clumsily but it's been blown a little out of proportion imo. Surprised that the argument is seemingly still continuing on Twitter, given everything that's happened in the last 48 hours, but there we go. The internet is serious business, after all, but it all seemed a bit unnecessary and unedifying.
Can see why some felt it was a loaded question and are a bit wary, especially after Nick Harris' recent sham questionnaire, but Lee is hardly in the category as Harris. Not entirely sure what the purpose of his article is though, given that the middle ground he mentions probably represents the vast majority of City fans (certainly those that I know, at least). I doubt we'll be getting any unique insight into how most of us already think, but I'll reserve judgement until the article is published.
For what it's worth, I don't care about his background as a United fan. I don't really want a City cheerleader like a James Pearce or Simon Hughes. Just someone who writes intelligently and fairly about my club.
United have cancelled their sponsorship with Aeroflot.The government banned a company and the rags carry on with there sponsor is that legal?
You know Sam's including that in his 100 non-miltant cranks responses.Why blues taking an interest and challenging the bullshit is important. If left alone media types and average Jo respondents will write with impunity and the opinions set in stone
Mate sent me this reader response from the dipper Echo which had run an article saying that dipperpool might follow us into the metaverse.
Apparently, along with the usual shitty jibes about emptyhad was this belter from someone who it’s safe to assume is a long way off being a rocket scientist!
StJamieOfAnfield
Firstly any figures posted by citeh should be taken with a massive pinch of salt. There accounts are probably even less reliable and truthful than Donald Trumps. The reason I think the emptyhad is always largely empty is because they always sell out every game. Why the empty seats? Maybe because they are "sold" for tens of thousands of pounds per game. Then there is the sponsorship and hospitality. A state run club being sponsored by a state run airline????? Mmm it doesn't take a rocket scientist to join the dots. It keeps corruption to stop the UK media reporting it and the "authorities" stamping it out with 5 Yr transfer bans at all age levels and 8 figure fines.
No. I've already said so a few pages back:Do you think the vast majority of the media give us fair & balanced treatment Ric?
Welcome to Militant Crank-hood then. Your membership card's in the post. The roll of tinfoil and baseball bat will follow shortly.No. I've already said so a few pages back:
https://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/media-thread-2021-22.351471/page-1452#post-14636236