Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bozzie said:
No I think Paul went to Wilbraham the same as Nigel. Peter Barnes went to Chorlton I think albeit I heard he chickened out of the fighting in the park! Did Steve Murphy and Ray Vaughan play for Manor House?
Click to expand...
Yes, Paul Hart was in the year above me at Wilbraham. Our year had three or four lads who played for Manchester Boys and the school team won the Wilfred Hays trophy, which was a big deal in those days.
 
jrb said:
7-FFA803-E-DB3-F-4075-9266-CE20-B8468-F31.jpg


Comments section.

Article by Liam Morgan, who i follow on Twitter. States he is an MUFC season ticket holder in his bio. Oh the irony Liam.

The vast majority of comments agree with Serg, including fans of other clubs. Only the Rags don’t, and are having a pop at Serg.
Click to expand...
Top lad serg!
 
Mid Wales blue said:
To be fair, he’s spot on about how Southgate should be leaving out player’s he knows all about, and instead, should be focusing on player’s who haven’t had as much playing time for England.
Click to expand...
The most frustrating thing about the article, for me. Is the fact Merson has just spouted a simple view and ran with it.

no questioning or trying to elaborate on why Southgate has decided to pick Sterling and any of the other regulars.

I think it’s probably because other players dropping out and he wants to blend the new caps into the team style of play.

and City want him to have minutes. Keeps him match fit.

that’s my guess anyway.
 
Marvin said:
This is only indirectly City related but this annoyed me immensely...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-60859049

HRW writing about Iraq. This is a country where unspeakable atrocities were committed by Western armies and here we have a Washington agency talking about human rights. I support gay rights, and equality for all but how dare a Western agency lecture Iraqi society about human suffering! This is appalling.

The City connection is that it is these same agencies who write about Qatar and the UAE. Let the Arabs sort out their own countries, and if you are interested in humanity how about you have the moral courage to question your own state, and their politicians? But that is not your function is it. You are there to provide the moral justification for regime change should you desire it.
Click to expand...
You know it’s possible for a person to oppose abuses of human rights everywhere, right? Indeed that’s kind of the point of them, their universality. The hypocrisy of HRW, or the USA, or whoever is irrelevant.
 
KPXBLN said:
You know it’s possible for a person to oppose abuses of human rights everywhere, right? Indeed that’s kind of the point of them, their universality. The hypocrisy of HRW, or the USA, or whoever is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
No it is not irrelevant. If anyone is washing and re-writing history it is these Western rights organisations. If you bomb a country into oblivion, how do you expect its society to progress? These organisations are supposed to concerned about human welfare but in reality all they do is try and justify their own existence and justify further military interventions.
 
Marvin said:
No it is not irrelevant. If anyone is washing and re-writing history it is these Western rights organisations. If you bomb a country into oblivion, how do you expect its society to progress? These organisations are supposed to concerned about human welfare but in reality all they do is try and justify their own existence and justify further military interventions.
Click to expand...
Spot on Marvin. HRW has even been accused of bias by its own founder & ex-chair, Robert Bernstein. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Human_Rights_Watch

As mentioned in that article, compare its treatment of Israel with that of Kashmir or the other far more appalling regimes around the Middle East. Our own friend McGeehan was vocal about the UAE but had little to say about Qatar, which also fell under his brief. That may tell you something.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Spot on Marvin. HRW has even been accused of bias by its own founder & ex-chair, Robert Bernstein. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Human_Rights_Watch

As mentioned in that article, compare its treatment of Israel with that of Kashmir or the other far more appalling regimes around the Middle East. Our own friend McGeehan was vocal about the UAE but had little to say about Qatar, which also fell under his brief. That may tell you something.
Click to expand...

My favourite social media thing during the Russian sanctions was watching how many people were screeching about Israel and Palestine asking why nobody was focusing on that. From absolute top tier geniuses like Hector Bellerin.

Yeah nobody has ever mentioned Israel and Palestine before. Never saw a single story about it anywhere lads.

And McGeehan's goal with his anti-City stuff has always been personal enrichment. He was a "researcher" for years and nobody cared about what he said or the documentary that he had been shopping around to TV stations. Suddenly he mentioned City and got some attention and a Netflix meeting. They told him to fuck off of course, but the strategy of more attention = more cash is a sound one.
 
Marvin said:
This is only indirectly City related but this annoyed me immensely...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-60859049

HRW writing about Iraq. This is a country where unspeakable atrocities were committed by Western armies and here we have a Washington agency talking about human rights. I support gay rights, and equality for all but how dare a Western agency lecture Iraqi society about human suffering! This is appalling.

The City connection is that it is these same agencies who write about Qatar and the UAE. Let the Arabs sort out their own countries, and if you are interested in humanity how about you have the moral courage to question your own state, and their politicians? But that is not your function is it. You are there to provide the moral justification for regime change should you desire it.
Click to expand...
I have always felt that HRW is more concerned about politics than human rights.
 
Marvin said:
No it is not irrelevant. If anyone is washing and re-writing history it is these Western rights organisations. If you bomb a country into oblivion, how do you expect its society to progress? These organisations are supposed to concerned about human welfare but in reality all they do is try and justify their own existence and justify further military interventions.
Click to expand...
Like I said, human rights exist independently of the pronouncements of any one human rights organisation. Pointed to alleged hypocrisy on the part of HRW, or whoever, doesn’t actually invalidate any given thing they’ve said about a particular country.
 
CelesteItis said:
Nope Karen, exposing the unending "democratic" western lies does not condone the russian imperialist aggression to Ukraine; a proxy war that was prepared since 2014 by the Nazis Are Totally Ours and that cuckolded ugly cow Clinton (aka Madame War Criminal) by arming the Nazis. They don't care about the suffering Ukrainians as long as their military industrial complex profits.
That said, fuck you too, Karen.
Click to expand...
Err mods - this guy needs a permanent ban - not only is he talking shite but this is supposed to be a football forum - let him go spout this crap on Trumps Twitter whatever it’s called….people like this boil my blood - sling your hook scum!
 
KPXBLN said:
Like I said, human rights exist independently of the pronouncements of any one human rights organisation.
Click to expand...
But we can go further than that. American comment on the state of Iraqi civil society is unacceptable given that they destroyed it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top