Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
The attack dogs are out in force this weekend.

Don’t click and don’t read the lies. Paid puppets trying to damage the city brand.

I hope the club is aware and take the appropriate action.

disgusting behaviour based on nothing but football jealousy. All fans want an owner like ours but that is not possible and most owners unfortunately suck the clubs dry and load it with debt.

The papers must need the clicks to survive. Shame as football fans deserve better than unfounded made up rhetoric.

Anyway, it will go way over the heads of any football fan who wants to believe this is actually happening. Try not to slap anyone ;)
 
Exeter Blue I am here said:
I see the results of Harris’s confirmation bias survey are in (not gonna post a link to the cnut’s article). Unsurprisingly, questions along the lines of “would you like to see the evil, baby killing monsters, who own dirty cheating Manchester City, thrown out of football”, have been firmly endorsed by supporters of the rags and the dippers, who absolutely haven’t got a hat in the ring of any description. The man’s an utter fucking prick
Click to expand...

Aaaah wondered when it was going to appear & then the international break arrives. It’s funny how well they plan ahead.
 
wolviedinho said:
The attack dogs are out in force this weekend.

Don’t click and don’t read the lies. Paid puppets trying to damage the city brand.

I hope the club is aware and take the appropriate action.

disgusting behaviour based on nothing but football jealousy. All fans want an owner like ours but that is not possible and most owners unfortunately suck the clubs dry and load it with debt.

The papers must need the clicks to survive. Shame as football fans deserve better than unfounded made up rhetoric.

Anyway, it will go way over the heads of any football fan who wants to believe this is actually happening. Try not to slap anyone ;)
Click to expand...
It goes way beyond wanting to damage the City brand. They want the complete ruination of our club. They want a gloating, mutual back slapping, spiteful ‘triumph’ and unfortunately the situation with Abramovich and Putin has given them an ‘in’, the opportunity to both manufacture and distort a narrative to their own advantage and to ensure that it is one that will appeal to a public which is currently ripe to be both outraged and deceived.
As to City taking ‘appropriate action’, we all know that libel is all but impossible to prove. We’ll do what we’ve spent 12 years doing. Fuck all
 
Last edited:
paulchapo said:
Yet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.

OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator​

Click to expand...
Is it the owner who hasn’t taken money out if the club hmmm.
 

​

paulchapo said:
Yet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.

OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator​

Click to expand...
Oliver, what are you claiming our owners are greedy for? Money or Trophies

If it is the first,I am pretty sure you are very wide of the mark, could you provide how much they have taken out of the club against what they have invested. If it is the second probably guilty as charged. But surely all clubs are 'greedy' for trophies, as many of your ilk laud the achievements of 'the established teams' when they have dominated the English trophies. Why is it OK for scum, dippers and tarquins to win many trophies and not others.

Have you and others ever considered how teams found success in the 30's through 90's , was it all through the spirit of amateurism, luck, or a bloody good show. Probably not. Most probably through investment of money, which brings good facilities, wages, structure and therefore the better players.

What you seem to not like is the dismantling of the status quo, a changing of the guard so to speak, tbh I don't know of any registered legitimate business in any other market place, where investment and success is seen as a negative.
 
Last edited:
bigstanhibbert said:

​


Oliver, what are you claiming our owners are greedy for? Money or Trophies

If it is the first,I am pretty sure you are very wide of the mark, could you provide how much they have taken out of the club against what they have invested. If it is the second probably guilty as charged.But surely all clubs are 'greedy' for trophies, as many of your ilk laud the achievements of 'the established teams' when they have dominated the English trophies. Why is it OK for scum, dippers and tarquins to win many trophies and not others.

Have you and others ever considered how teams found success in the 30's through 90's , was it all through the spirit of amateurism, luck, or a bloody good show. Probably not. Most probably through investment of money, which brings good facilities, wages, structure and therefore the better players.

What you seem to not like is the dismantling of the status quo, a changing of the guardnso to speak, tbh I don't know of any registered legitimate business in any other market place, where investment and success is seen as a negative.
Click to expand...

Football clubs were originally created by rich industrialists unless they want to back further to Sunday school teachers?
 
Exeter Blue I am here said:
I see the results of Harris’s confirmation bias survey are in (not gonna post a link to the cnut’s article). Unsurprisingly, questions along the lines of “would you like to see the evil, baby killing monsters, who own dirty cheating Manchester City, thrown out of football”, have been firmly endorsed by supporters of the rags and the dippers, who absolutely haven’t got a hat in the ring of any description. The man’s an utter fucking prick
Click to expand...
And I notice the rags average net transfer spend is 46m less than city's, absolute bs. That **** Harris has just made all this article up, supposedly a fan opinion, what an utter bellend
 
paulchapo said:
Yet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.

OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator​

Click to expand...
Whether the headline is right or wrong, what has it got to do with our club ? The man is a tool.
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
He's FairSquare now and has been for a while.
Rabin delved into the reasons McG left HRW. Based on Rabin's epic thread McG was fos and partial to a pork pie.
Well worth click and a re-read:

Click to expand...

McGeehan and his whatsapp pals hearts must have sunk when they read this. Rabin eats them alive.

I see Nick Harris is headlining another article on the Daily Mail which seems to be a dig towards City. Look at this from the article, he’s made this up. The bloke is a nutter.
Detractor view: ‘Most realise we haven’t obeyed FFP, that’s why everyone hates us. Like to have done it without breaking the rules. But trophies!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top