Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
I cancelled my licence years ago and have had 3 visits from the licence fee goons (capita). All you have to say is that you revoke their implied right to access and close the door.
You can’t revoke something that’s implied. It has to be tangible and express to be capable of boing revoked.
 
I always thought it was sung in reference to some of the Chelsea headhunters top boys either being gay or being caught with male prostitutes. The inference being that you can’t be all macho and a thug if you are ga hence why it’s homophobic.
Hadn't heard that before. May be so.
 
In contrast, this is how Simon reported the flare being thrown down from the away fans at the Liverpool game(he didn't) and he had to get a dig in about noise too before the end of the game.





He genuinely shouldn't be allowed access of any kind to City on the grounds that his reporting his completely imbalanced.

This is his level. Regurgitating chants and actions of fans from the stadium.

Sports reporter? Nothing but a talentless gimp.
 
We’re a week away from a derby, where United have a bit of momentum.

Shall we have a guess, at who the media will be splashing over the back pages as wanting out of City this week?

Grealish or Dias for me. Maybe Pep?
 
We’re a week away from a derby, where United have a bit of momentum.

Shall we have a guess, at who the media will be splashing over the back pages as wanting out of City this week?

Grealish or Dias for me. Maybe Pep?
I'm sure it will Be 'are the players still with Pep', if we continue with underwhelming performances against Chelsea and Soton
 
I'd bet on his nothing quote as just being made up. In a no news cycle I'd suggest it is more a case of him finding something to fill a few column inches. In fact, just listened to the Panja/Harris/Ziegler pod and they were setting their stall out for the big stories in football for 2023 involving UEFA, FIFA, football regulator in England etc and Panja in his normal sarcastic tone asked Ziegler about an independent regulator and brought City and into the discussion.

Ziegler spends a lot of his time in hotel lobbies for meetings of this type searching for info and usually on the pod he talks about the meetings he attends. No mention this week that he attended this summit so just a case of re-hasing his previous shit. The article itself from the Times is pure BS full of the usual innuendo and outright factually incorrect on at least 5 counts.
Perhaps it was just a bit of a fishing expedition. But I am not a great believer in coincidences when it comes to hostile coverage of City. I wasn't suggesting Ziegler actually attended the meeting. But the Times sportsdesk has an existing channel from one of the people in that room which dates a long way back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.