Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone please tell Simon Jordan to stop repeating misinformation on the CAS verdict being based on "technicalites".

He said it multiple times in this clip and he's been repeating it every time it comes up. I'd actually love if CAS reacted with legal threats to his accusations:


There's a Live youtube link:


Jordan is constantly repeating lies about the CAS hearing. He has just repeated the same tripe about time barred and inflating sponsorship deals.

Who the fuck at City allows this to go unchallenged.
 
I know for a fact James Ducker is a red (used to be mates with his brother), so he can be added to the list with Sam Lee and others. Martin Samuel usually talks sense and facts, so keen to hear his take on it.

I'd be shocked if Samuel doesn't say "if they're found guilty, throw the book at them" - that's a position which I find difficult to argue with.

I expect he would also raise some of the questions about the timing and whether the charges are fishing.
 
Jordan is constantly repeating lies about the CAS hearing. He has just repeated the same tripe about time barred and inflating sponsorship deals.

Who the fuck at City allows this to go unchallenged.

City PR / media team are soft as shite, that's why.
 
Jordan is constantly repeating lies about the CAS hearing. He has just repeated the same tripe about time barred and inflating sponsorship deals.

Who the fuck at City allows this to go unchallenged.
I'd really like to know if anyone on here has tried to phone in. I know why people wouldn't fancy it because he always goes rogue(dark arts to fluster the opposition) on people who are getting the better of him, before the editors cut them off the line and move on but it's like they already know what argument they are going to make before they are on the line for 99% of the callers. He's never challenged on his mistakes/misinformation. That says to me they are vetting callers. Those who know their onions would have to strategise, to get around their guard.
 
Last edited:
I'd really like to know if anyone on here has tried to phone in. I know why people wouldn't fancy it because he always goes rogue on people who are getting the better of him before the editors cut them off the line and move on but it's like they already know what argument they are going to make before they are on the line for 99% of the callers. He's never challenged on his mistakes/misinformation.
Some City fan phoned in early but was stating FFP rules ain’t fair instead of telling Jordan he’s talking out of his arse and knows nothing about the CAS ruling.
 
Some City fan phoned in early but was stating FFP rules ain’t fair instead of telling Jordan he’s talking out of his arse and knows nothing about the CAS ruling.
I already know what to expect when I give the clown a listen but it never fails to disappoint me that nobody says what I'm waiting for them to argue.
 
Ladies n gentlemen… the great british media

5 mins of 5live on with that smug **** nicky campbell (who called us manchester united)
They had on;

Steve the scouser: its not fair, we cant afford to buy anyone and went toe to toe with city. They should be stripped of titles
(He literally said, “we cant afford to buy anyone”. He wasnt pulled up on £85m cart horse nunez)

Ali from yorkshire: city were fined £10m off uefa so MUST be guilty of something. He , of course, wasnt put right on that fact.

Richard from boston; boston were relegated 3 divisions for cooking the books so the same thing should happen to city. It wasnt questioned what exactly boston had done and whether it was the same.

Then… campbell introduced ‘mike the 4th generation city fan’. Great i thought, bit of balance.
Mike wanted to put ali right in what the uefa fine was for.
Campbell first cut him off mid sentence to say a stoke fan had text in and said the 2011 fa cup win should be handed to stoke. (Mike called him an imbecile from stoke. Nice one mike).
Then before mike could finish what he had been interuptedly started he was cut off to go to the news. He never hot more than 10 seconds to explain the uefa fine and it was nothing to do with us being guilty of anything!!
 
I'd be shocked if Samuel doesn't say "if they're found guilty, throw the book at them" - that's a position which I find difficult to argue with.

I expect he would also raise some of the questions about the timing and whether the charges are fishing.
I think we can all agree if we’re found guilty we should be punished…but so long as the forensic analysis is also applied to the rest of the PL……..
 
For once can't complain of a lack of City coverage on radio 2, 8 30 sports news this week. Yesterday orgasmic response to Kanes goal against us on Sunday, this morning extended coverage of charges against us, which they seem to have already decided our guilt. Not one word of balance. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE.
 
For once can't complain of a lack of City coverage on radio 2, 8 30 sports news this week. Yesterday orgasmic response to Kanes goal against us on Sunday, this morning extended coverage of charges against us, which they seem to have already decided our guilt. Not one word of balance. WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE.
I think we spoiled the fun for the red shirts oh and our owners seem to be the wrong colour.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.