No issue with that at all other than to point out language like that is commonplace on here in certain other threads and never gets a mention.
That said, back to the media thread….
I don't mean doesn't exist at all, I mean doesn't exist in the terms presented in the accounts. ie there is a contract for the auditors and then there is, in essence, the "real" contract.
Anyway, I don't think these charges are simply about the filing - the reference to "true and fair" makes it clear what the allegation is ie that what has been submitted is not true and fair. And that was the essence of CAS too.
The fact that an error on RP re Etihad wouldn't really affect the true and fair nature of the accounts (technically I think that is probably arguable) BUT would mean a breach of the rules again points to the importance of the mentioning of "true and fair". Again, that the charge is not merely a miscategorisation of RP contracts.
But the biggest indicator is that neither City nor the PL have denied to the media that the charges are the particularly serious ones alleged. And I can assure you many journalists have asked them.
You're right. All I'd say is that, in the modern climate, if you want to criticise someone and use those kinds of terms, you give them an easy get-out, where they don't have to address the substance of what you say but can hide behind issues of language and the like.
I'd say it's better to watch what you say and don't give them the chance. Box clever, if you like to put it that way.
Just for clarification, is it the pronoun that causes the perceived misogyny or misandry - or is it the pejorative word?You're right. All I'd say is that, in the modern climate, if you want to criticise someone and use those kinds of terms, you give them an easy get-out, where they don't have to address the substance of what you say but can hide behind issues of language and the like.
I'd say it's better to watch what you say and don't give them the chance. Box clever, if you like to put it that way.
By us or by them? I hope by us because we should continue to show the lot of them that we are no longer prepared to be the quiet, take all the rubbish, club any more. Take us on and you take on ALL of us, bosses, manager, coaches, players, admin, canteen people, kit washers, and last but by no means least, FANS!
Get lost you stupid, arrogant, self centred load of wallies! We are Manchester City and we fight to the end and we WILL prevail.
:-) :-)
If you report those posts we can deal with them too.No issue with that at all other than to point out language like that is commonplace on here in certain other threads and never gets a mention.
I was looking at Martin Keown's body language. He was swinging in a tyre and eating a banana.
exactly she’s thick as two short planks, that’s immaterial to wether she’s a man or a woman.Why is it OK to call Delaney et al thick but not Reddy? Genuine misogyny I understand and agree with your action but not being very selective about who you can call thick.
There was language that went beyond calling her thick that I read. Calling her a woman crosses a line in my opinionexactly she’s thick as two short planks, that’s immaterial to wether she’s a man or a woman.