Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dribble said:
I've also been hammering home this point to my Spuds supporting family members & it seems the tide is turning.

They're no longer interested in the "City are cheats, & that's why Spuds can't prosper" narrative from the poisoned dwarf Levy. The penny's dropped & their fans are now turning their anger toward him.

They've long since had enough & now they're sweating over even getting Europa Conference League football & facing the loss of Kane, it's made them extremely pissed with the club's leadership.

How many seasons can you keep the "We'd be winning everything, if it wasn't for that pesky Manchester City" narrative going for?
Click to expand...
They won fook all before we came along... surely their fans aren't that stupid... oh, wait!
 
I have noticed as we became nearer to winning the title the narrative of the journalist are going by now is we have are manufactured team and money source is an issue when the prem is rolling in money these days.

City playing great football leaves something cold inside. It’s pathetic at this point I feel they try and undermine our team. Barca comparison was bought up on the times Game podcast and I was just annoyed with the haters just finding something to fault us with.

The argument if we win treble the way we got to this point has to be accounted for! Since when was off field issues ever a talking point on what happened in 90mins. Disgusted these Liverpool Man U supporting journos finding a way to tarnish our win whatever way they can. Very disappointing impartial journalism is still lacking.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2036.jpeg
    IMG_2036.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 147
The perfect fumble said:
Even by the standards of the gutter this is low......

Manchester City are best of all time and nobody gives a f***; take note, Premier League​


https://www.football365.com/news/manchester-city-best-all-time-nobody-cares-john-nicholson-opinion
Click to expand...
Didn't get past the 2nd paragraph.

"write an article about no one being bothered about city winning the league and ignore the irony of writing an article about not being bothered".

"What is irony?"

"Thanks chatgpt."
 
SSBlue said:
Not seen it mentioned but 5Live this morning were trying to make out that the reaction to the title win was subdued and that City fans felt it was clouded by the PL charges.

Firstly, fook right off telling me what I'm thinking or feeling.

Secondly anyone who thinks that celebration was subdued just wasn't there.

The whole report screamed Pre-Written
Click to expand...

gordondaviesmoustache said:
I don’t remember any journalists stridently reporting that if the Coolmore 99 questions weren’t satisfactorily answered (and they were, in fact, never answered at all) that Ferguson’s legacy would even be tainted, never mind ruined.

So on the one hand, we have some allegations of City as a club breaking financial rules, which essentially predate our manager’s time at the club, which relate to matters at board and shareholder level - and these fucking nonces are trying to suggest that in some way it will tarnish the results on the pitch this season, following a gap of 5-14 years from the matters alleged, of which there is not a single suggestion that Pep or the players are connected in any way to those allegations.

Yet on the other hand, not one of these spineless fucking cunts dared suggest that those 99 questions, which clearly implied Ferguson had taken backhanders (and a number of United signings around that time were highly questionable ) made by two significant shareholders in that club at the time, which still remain wholly unanswered to this day, would in any way tarnish Ferguson’s legacy, despite the much stronger nexus between him, the team he built, and the strongly implied allegations of financial impropriety.

Where were all the journalist back then giving it the Billy Big Bollocks?

Absolute fucking spineless, hypocritical nonce cunts.
Click to expand...
I remember Ferguson banning any journalists who asked uncomfortable questions at his news conferences. Before banning them he would try to humiliate and bully them in front of the assembled press pack. The other journos would therefore take note and keep licking his ring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.