Yep. If those figures are accurate the spend by the rags and Chelsea is incredible given the position of both in 2008. But that angle does not generate clicks.Not going to click on it but if that graphic is correct doesn't it basically show that it has cost us 15% more spend than our rival to go from a standing start light years behind with the deck stacked against us to being utterly dominant?
You can have a separate conversation about the obscene amount of money in football but that just seems to be a tale of an incredible turnaround story and an unbelievably well run club.