I think you are overestimating the reach of the likes of Delaney specifically, who I was referring to in my post. I think many blues do.
Obviously I cannot prove my theory that most of the engagement of his anti-City articles comes from rage-sharing by blues, and I could of course be wrong, but I think the way in which they are written, how he distributes links (often via Twitter diatribe threads), and the headlines used for them points specifically to trap-clickbait for City fans. Of course rival fans who hate us will read it, as it confirms their worldview, but I assert they are far less likely to share the articles across their networks than blues; they simply comment about how right Delaney is and how more people should speak this “truth”.
Rage-sharing is where the real money is, hence why so much of media now is about angering the right group to get something to go viral.
And the likes of Delaney have become a master of it with City fans.
I like the theory, and find it interesting, but I don't just don't buy it, sorry. Either way, I tend not to share links to negative articles by default, as they neither amuse or excite me as the positive ones, so I guess I contribute to your movement. But I feel it has all been said now, so happy to get back to actual content rather than its sharing patterns, which is a whole discussion in itself as you rightly point out.