Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Marriner was the ref and I was told his initial report said he had seen it and didn't think it was a foul. He was promised the League Cup final if he changed it to say he hadn't seen it, meaning it could be looked at retrospectively.

And in case you think I'm making this up, I told a few on here that, well before they announced the ref for that LC final.
Halsey said he was asked (told) to alter match reports. The PiGMOL deny this obviously...

 
Fuck me, I can only presume that he saw Maddock's Tweet and decided to try and change the narrative, ahead of a campaign to free Nunez, after all, Nunez is the victim here. A shame that Klopp had already stated it was a correct decision, I guess he missed that bit.
 
Marriner was the ref and I was told his initial report said he had seen it and didn't think it was a foul. He was promised the League Cup final if he changed it to say he hadn't seen it, meaning it could be looked at retrospectively.

And in case you think I'm making this up, I told a few on here that, well before they announced the ref for that LC final.
If you are tempted to make things up, go write for the Grauniad. Otherwise, we believe you. Nifty work on falsifying our accounts btw…..oops.
 
Halsey said he was asked (told) to alter match reports. The PiGMOL deny this obviously...

There is no doubt individual incidents of corruption have happened. It is not a coincidence that some incidents are highlighted in the press and others ignored. I don’t believe the recent absurd Nunes “accidental” head butt narrative was a coincidence.
 
Fuck me, I can only presume that he saw Maddock's Tweet and decided to try and change the narrative, ahead of a campaign to free Nunez, after all, Nunez is the victim here. A shame that Klopp had already stated it was a correct decision, I guess he missed that bit.
Klopp didn't get the memo in time. I'm sure he'll be put straight by the Clanfield Media & Comm's team.
 
Marriner was the ref and I was told his initial report said he had seen it and didn't think it was a foul. He was promised the League Cup final if he changed it to say he hadn't seen it, meaning it could be looked at retrospectively.

And in case you think I'm making this up, I told a few on here that, well before they announced the ref for that LC final.

Wasn’t the camera footage and still showing him looking straight at it? Then he said he’d not seen it. I remember that controversy clear as day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.