Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's the hypocrisy that gets me! As with United.
'If you put money unto the club, you're a sugar daddy. The club should live off its revenues?'
'Why aren't the Glazer bastards putting their money into United? The money they spend is the club's.'
 
It's the hypocrisy that gets me! As with United.
'If you put money unto the club, you're a sugar daddy. The club should live off its revenues?'
'Why aren't the Glazer bastards putting their money into United? The money they spend is the club's.'

The money they putting in now for this splurge to come ain’t there money now it’s a loan added to the debt so it’s the banks money
 
A bit more serious when the twat is on sky sports news spouting it though I think, surprised sky are allowing the **** on to say shit like that when it's their live game! Surely slander/defamation or something towards our owners unless he's got evidence to prove they are sportswashing he should keep his fuckin mouth shut and needs putting in his place and made to look the twat that he is.
Maybe City could say the owners were not attracted for PR but the huge wads of cash on offer from sky.
 
The only issue I see that can hurt us is little Jimmy/Jane wanting to be a City fan/buy stuff/go to a game etc and the parents believe all the printed & spoken shit which could lead to loss of fans as they're steered towards good wholesome red shirt clubs instead
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.