Media thread 2022/23

[deano ou812]

View attachment 54121
Here is Sky Sports just casually adding £34.5 million to Haaland’s transfer fee and chalking off one of his goals.

You’re not telling me they got both wrong by accident.

Is that not the fee the red scousers paid for the head butting nunez,sky wish it was him who had scored the hat trick and have 6 goals after 4 games ..

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

lfc broke the record for goals, they're bound to be in the news too.
====
Equalled it.

Tbh I don't really care as much.

 

[SilvaisSkyBlue]

I've seen nothing but praise for Haaland today, what paper should i be reading for a negative?. Also our goalie messed up a few times yesterday especially for that disallowed goal for palace, if the press had it in for us they could of gone with that, it could of been given. Ederson is starting to worry me. Tin hat on.

Of course your right, the thousands of negative articles each season are cancelled out by the begrudgingly given positive articles when we come back from 2-0 down and Haaland scores his first hat trick.

Why would the press target the disallowed goal? It was disallowed as it wasn’t a goal in the eyes of the ref, so yet it could of been given, but correctly wasn’t, you sound a little gutted.

Also, funny your whole post is indicating no press bias, whilst the overwhelming evidence is right in front of us on a daily basis, confirmed not only by City themselves but people on here who work in that profession.

Ederson offers City far more positives to our whole style of play than negatives, so he and more importantly Guardiola couldn’t give a fûck what you think, but good on you for bringing another negative to your post, outstanding work.

 

[whipper]

LiveScore App, difference between Mendy and Greenwood.

 

[levets]

You’d think our ‘in house’ media would get things right…

 

[argyle]

Don't know where to put this but I guess Twitter is part of the media.

City have been putting out a lot of good content for Pride weekend the past 3 or 4 days. The comments underneath the tweets have been disappointing to say the least.

Most were from new fans in the Middle East and America and many were disgusting. It's twitter, so it's to be expected but I don't like some of these new fans who have only just started following.

I don't expect many replies but I needed to say it.

 

[Centurions]

Don't know where to put this but I guess Twitter is part of the media.

City have been putting out a lot of good content for Pride weekend the past 3 or 4 days. The comments underneath the tweets have been disappointing to say the least.

Most were from new fans in the Middle East and America and many were disgusting. It's twitter, so it's to be expected but I don't like some of these new fans who have only just started following.

I don't expect many replies but I needed to say it.

Very few seem to be from City fans happily, although there are some numpties. The none City fans are truly pathetic. It's Twitter where the morons come out to play with no come back (and no, there are no puns in there before anyone asks).

 

[give it to gordon]

Is it just me but if the keeper saves a penalty its not a missed penalty it's a saved penalty. A missed penalty is when the taker misses the goal.

From the bbc after the penalty was saved

 

[jrb]

Not City.

Talk about dragging out a European Cup win for a headline paragraph.

 

[Stephen230]

Is it just me but if the keeper saves a penalty its not a missed penalty it's a saved penalty. A missed penalty is when the taker misses the goal.

From the bbc after the penalty was saved

View attachment 54155

You often hear of players “missing a glorious chance” from open play when the ‘keeper has saved it, so I don’t think the term is generally used to only describe shots off target.