supercity88 said:Falastur said:supercity88 said:Fuck me that's an over reaction! Your club was founded in 2009!!! 2009!!! You're 5 years old! MK Dons have more soul than your club do and that's saying something. Your clubs record appearance holder has 82 appearances and your record goal scorer has 15 goals... we have players who score more than that in a season. Get a grip! Whilst David Villa may have had an off day I believe he has already scored a couple for you and you should be proud that he is wearing the shirt considering what he has achieved in his career.
I'm curious. At what age do you believe a club "earns" the right to have fans?
Incidentally, it's only seven years since our top scorer for the season struggled to score seven goals (lower than Heart have ever had as a top scorer total), and that despite having played almost twice as many games as Heart/City have ever played in a season, so that's a pretty poor insult to aim at another club.
I'm curious as to why you're being such a pedantic moron. I've never questioned a clubs rights to having fans. But it's about perspective. The club is 5 years old. Are you saying that fans of Melbourne City will feel as aggrieved as Cardiff City fans for changing their shirt colour. Or Hull City when it was mentioned that they would be changing their name? These are clubs with stories to tell and success and misery over a long period of time. It's the same as listening to a 5 year old talk about the hard times or the good old times and then listening to a 90 year old. Even moving to the Etihad stadium took time to get used to. There was no history to it and the atmosphere at times was a bit flat. Now we have stories to tell and things are different. You can't seriously feel too aggrieved for this poor Melbourne fan who has to suffer watching David Villa jog around a pitch and succumb to their worst derby defeat ever (5 years). Get a grip.
I'll admit that I let my emotions get into that last post too much - I've been on the Melbourne City forum since the buyout there and the NYCFC forum since it first came into existence and have seen so many examples of MCFC fans coming along and telling people on both of those places that they have no right to feel upset about anything because their clubs are too young - it's kind of a trigger for me to get angry now.
To answer your question, though - yes I do believe that many Melbourne fans feel as strongly about their change of colours as Cardiff or Hull fans do, from what I've seen of them. Many, perhaps most, of the Melbourne Heart/City fans cite the exact same feelings of emotion and attachment to their club as (Manchester) City fans do about ours, and they react in exactly the same way to positive and negative news. I just can't get my head around people on this forum constantly believing that they can determine whether another person feels an emotional attachment to something or not.
You could use the exact same arguments that you are using to describe, say, a relationship break-up. A person who has been with their girlfriend for five years has some memories, has been on a few holidays together, but they don't have the experience of someone who has been married for 35 years - spending decades of their life with their partner, having kids and watching them grow up, getting to the point where they don't remember life as a single person. Does that, however, mean that a relationship of five years doesn't really hurt compared to a divorce after 35 years? Could someone who has just divorced the only partner they ever had in life realistically tell a guy who has just left their gf of five years to "get a grip" and proceed to berate them for feeling upset simply because their relationship did not last 35 years like his own one has, and doesn't have a fraction of the memories?