chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 23,351
Why not?Except that it's just not possible to do but other than that, yeah ...
Why not?Except that it's just not possible to do but other than that, yeah ...
Merseyside is poor. There’s no tunnel bus late to the Wirral and the trains stop by Midnight. Taxis notoriously won’t go under the water because they can’t get a fare back.Why would anyone use the tram from the City centre to the Airport when there is a vastly quicker rail service from Oxford Road and Piccadilly? The tram link was always intended to transport the Airport workforce to and from South Manchester, not for journeys from the Centre.
The last train from Manchester to Stockport tonight is 23:37. Thirteen trains run after 22:00 from Manchester to Stockport today.
If you think that transport in Manchester is bad you should look at other Cities.
You can only run a certain number of trams on each stretch of track due to the power capabilities. A double uses more electricity than a single unit for instance.Why not?
Ah ok, so it’s the power available which is the limiting factor is it, rather than anything else? Didn’t appreciate that.You can only run a certain number of trams on each stretch of track due to the power capabilities. A double uses more electricity than a single unit for instance.
They’re running as much as they can so trying to fit more trams in won’t work.
The rail connection from the airport takes 15-20 minutes. Why would anyone want to go by tram stopping at every lamppost?Maybe Manchester but not from the airport
As far as I have read, yes, this seems to be the main problem. Not sure if they can do anything about it. I’d also suspect that even if they could get them to run every 3 mins for instance that the chances of jams would increase anyway.Ah ok, so it’s the power available which is the limiting factor is it, rather than anything else? Didn’t appreciate that.
So basically, that’s down to TfGM is it? Could the club influence/contribute to improving this situation??
In a perfect world, an upgrade of Ashburys and bringing that line by the athletics arena wouldn’t go amiss either. It’s not as if there isn’t already some infrastructure in place.As far as I have read, yes, this seems to be the main problem. Not sure if they can do anything about it. I’d also suspect that even if they could get them to run every 3 mins for instance that the chances of jams would increase anyway.
It needs new lines unfortunately but there’s nothing in the near future being discussed.
So far, it's only being spent in London.There'll have to be some infrastructure expansion at some point. There's talk of converting the Rose Hill Marple and Glossop / Hadfield lines to "tram trains", so all those trams have to go somewhere into and across the city.
There's either going to have to be some sort of underground running or more viaducts. Neither would be cheap, but I guess all that money earmarked for HS2 phase 2 has to be spent somewhere!
The problem with Newark is ‘United’, I see the word emblazoned on the plane and I’m suddenly BA BaracusJFK is actually really shit considering it’s the main airport for arguably the no. 1 city on the planet.
I’ve been to New York twice, flew to JFK once and Newark the other. Miles easier getting into the city from Newark.