Well , Its definitely not mine.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Micah Richards the pundit
- Thread starter MCFC1993
- Start date
Aba452
Well-Known Member
Credit to him, he was slightly better today than usual guffawing clown, low bar!
Shearer going on about Stones not galloping into midfield - like he does for City - guessing it's cos we ain't got a great defence and Declan Rice is doing a Madame Tussauds sitting, tront..........no words.
Saka has had a goal contribution, but he's been rather invisible but immune from criticism. Obviously.
Kane took his goal well but playing deeper than the Chilean miners!
Watkins did ok but why not bring Palmer on as well?
Wastecoat seems teflon unfortunately.
Thomas Frank was decent I thought and Denmark got fk all credit for playing well.
Not a complete disaster as I've got the Danes in the office sweep!
Shearer going on about Stones not galloping into midfield - like he does for City - guessing it's cos we ain't got a great defence and Declan Rice is doing a Madame Tussauds sitting, tront..........no words.
Saka has had a goal contribution, but he's been rather invisible but immune from criticism. Obviously.
Kane took his goal well but playing deeper than the Chilean miners!
Watkins did ok but why not bring Palmer on as well?
Wastecoat seems teflon unfortunately.
Thomas Frank was decent I thought and Denmark got fk all credit for playing well.
Not a complete disaster as I've got the Danes in the office sweep!
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Watch out for these preceding every starting sentence of Micha’s analysis…
You talk about 50%
We talk about 30%
They talk about 10%
I talk about 5%
None of the above 5%
You talk about 50%
We talk about 30%
They talk about 10%
I talk about 5%
None of the above 5%