Micah Richards the pundit

Micah's bad takes are a thing of beauty.

He said Cucurella was incredible when he was the worst player on the pitch last night.

Has Fabian Ruiz being better on the ball than Rodri.

Micah is trying too hard to improve his reputation as a proper technical pundit.

Maybe it's because he has the other technical genius, Rio next to him and thinks he needs to impress!
 
Micah's bad takes are a thing of beauty.

He said Cucurella was incredible when he was the worst player on the pitch last night.

Has Fabian Ruiz being better on the ball than Rodri.

Micah is trying too hard to improve his reputation as a proper technical pundit.

Maybe it's because he has the other technical genius, Rio next to him and thinks he needs to impress!
Tbf, Cucurella was not incredible, but was not worst player on the pitch. Jesus looked bad chasing Mpoopy, it is very interesting they did not try to capitalize on that flang more often. Rabiot also was arguably worst.

Best players for me were
Olmo - what a first touch and technique for the goal. also was thru ball and creativity galore.
Yamal - was sensational
and Rodri - was the glue that made Spain tick and unlocked Olmo and Yamal. Kids would say, that he pocketed Kante
 
Micah said that long haired fucker at Spain, Cuccerchelo *Chelsea, or some shit had a good game, he's absolute wank, target him that's England's best bet to win.
You generally see Cucurella pass backwards when he gets the ball. He did bomb forward a couple of times last night but he is a safe pass player. When he is threatened whilst on the ball he goes down like a sack of spuds. We dodged a bullet IMO.
 
Micah said that long haired fucker at Spain, Cuccerchelo *Chelsea, or some shit had a good game, he's absolute wank, target him that's England's best bet to win.
What does this even mean? Mangala wasn't a good defender but he had a brilliant game against Costa, if a pundit acknowledges that, would that make that pundit a bad pundit?

Cucurella had a good game yesterday, Pundits don't analyze a players past record on matchday, they talk about that players performance for that particular matchday. Micah giving Cucurella his credit yesterday is actually what you would expect from a good pundit. It's just weird how this hatred against Richards feels manufactured. Damned if he does, damnned if he doesn't
 
Micah's bad takes are a thing of beauty.

He said Cucurella was incredible when he was the worst player on the pitch last night.

Has Fabian Ruiz being better on the ball than Rodri.

Micah is trying too hard to improve his reputation as a proper technical pundit.

Maybe it's because he has the other technical genius, Rio next to him and thinks he needs to impress!
Navas was by FAR their WORSE player
 
Micah has clearly tried to move away from the class clown / village idiot act during this tournament. However he’ll be back at it come the start of the season on SKY, because that is what he he is scripted and paid to do. And to be fair he’s a natural at it.
 
What does this even mean? Mangala wasn't a good defender but he had a brilliant game against Costa, if a pundit acknowledges that, would that make that pundit a bad pundit?

Cucurella had a good game yesterday, Pundits don't analyze a players past record on matchday, they talk about that players performance for that particular matchday. Micah giving Cucurella his credit yesterday is actually what you would expect from a good pundit. It's just weird how this hatred against Richards feels manufactured. Damned if he does, damnned if he doesn't
He was probably Spains worst player, what game were you watching?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.